Filtered by vendor Siemens
Subscribe
Total
2114 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-5689 | 3 Hpe, Intel, Siemens | 71 Proliant Ml10 Gen9 Server, Proliant Ml10 Gen9 Server Firmware, Active Management Technology Firmware and 68 more | 2026-04-22 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Management Technology (AMT) and Intel Standard Manageability (ISM). An unprivileged local attacker could provision manageability features gaining unprivileged network or local system privileges on Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Management Technology (AMT), Intel Standard Manageability (ISM), and Intel Small Business Technology (SBT). | |||||
| CVE-2017-0148 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 27 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 24 more | 2026-04-22 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, and CVE-2017-0146. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0147 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 26 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511, Windows 10 1607 and 23 more | 2026-04-22 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via a crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2017-0146 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 27 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 24 more | 2026-04-22 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, and CVE-2017-0148. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0145 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 27 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 24 more | 2026-04-22 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0144 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 27 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 24 more | 2026-04-22 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0145, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0143 | 3 Microsoft, Philips, Siemens | 28 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 25 more | 2026-04-22 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0160 | 13 Broadcom, Canonical, Debian and 10 more | 35 Symantec Messaging Gateway, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 32 more | 2026-04-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8562 | 1 Siemens | 4 Simatic Cp 1543-1, Simatic Cp 1543-1 Firmware, Siplus Net Cp 1543-1 and 1 more | 2026-04-21 | 3.5 LOW | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CP 1543-1 (All versions < V2.0.28), SIPLUS NET CP 1543-1 (All versions < V2.0.28). Under special conditions it was possible to write SNMP variables on port 161/udp which should be read-only and should only be configured with TIA-Portal. A write to these variables could reduce the availability or cause a denial-of-service. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22925 | 7 Apple, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 4 more | 27 Mac Os X, Macos, Fedora and 24 more | 2026-04-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| curl supports the `-t` command line option, known as `CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS`in libcurl. This rarely used option is used to send variable=content pairs toTELNET servers.Due to flaw in the option parser for sending `NEW_ENV` variables, libcurlcould be made to pass on uninitialized data from a stack based buffer to theserver. Therefore potentially revealing sensitive internal information to theserver using a clear-text network protocol.This could happen because curl did not call and use sscanf() correctly whenparsing the string provided by the application. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3712 | 7 Debian, Mcafee, Netapp and 4 more | 32 Debian Linux, Epolicy Orchestrator, Clustered Data Ontap and 29 more | 2026-04-16 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y). | |||||
| CVE-2021-22947 | 8 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 34 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 31 more | 2026-04-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| When curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 connects to an IMAP or POP3 server to retrieve data using STARTTLS to upgrade to TLS security, the server can respond and send back multiple responses at once that curl caches. curl would then upgrade to TLS but not flush the in-queue of cached responses but instead continue using and trustingthe responses it got *before* the TLS handshake as if they were authenticated.Using this flaw, it allows a Man-In-The-Middle attacker to first inject the fake responses, then pass-through the TLS traffic from the legitimate server and trick curl into sending data back to the user thinking the attacker's injected data comes from the TLS-protected server. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22946 | 8 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 37 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 34 more | 2026-04-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A user can tell curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 to require a successful upgrade to TLS when speaking to an IMAP, POP3 or FTP server (`--ssl-reqd` on the command line or`CURLOPT_USE_SSL` set to `CURLUSESSL_CONTROL` or `CURLUSESSL_ALL` withlibcurl). This requirement could be bypassed if the server would return a properly crafted but perfectly legitimate response.This flaw would then make curl silently continue its operations **withoutTLS** contrary to the instructions and expectations, exposing possibly sensitive data in clear text over the network. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22922 | 6 Fedoraproject, Haxx, Netapp and 3 more | 23 Fedora, Curl, Cloud Backup and 20 more | 2026-04-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| When curl is instructed to download content using the metalink feature, thecontents is verified against a hash provided in the metalink XML file.The metalink XML file points out to the client how to get the same contentfrom a set of different URLs, potentially hosted by different servers and theclient can then download the file from one or several of them. In a serial orparallel manner.If one of the servers hosting the contents has been breached and the contentsof the specific file on that server is replaced with a modified payload, curlshould detect this when the hash of the file mismatches after a completeddownload. It should remove the contents and instead try getting the contentsfrom another URL. This is not done, and instead such a hash mismatch is onlymentioned in text and the potentially malicious content is kept in the file ondisk. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8285 | 9 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 6 more | 30 Mac Os X, Macos, Debian Linux and 27 more | 2026-04-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| curl 7.21.0 to and including 7.73.0 is vulnerable to uncontrolled recursion due to a stack overflow issue in FTP wildcard match parsing. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8284 | 9 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 6 more | 29 Mac Os X, Macos, Debian Linux and 26 more | 2026-04-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| A malicious server can use the FTP PASV response to trick curl 7.73.0 and earlier into connecting back to a given IP address and port, and this way potentially make curl extract information about services that are otherwise private and not disclosed, for example doing port scanning and service banner extractions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22898 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 3 more | 12 Debian Linux, Fedora, Curl and 9 more | 2026-04-16 | 2.6 LOW | 3.1 LOW |
| curl 7.7 through 7.76.1 suffers from an information disclosure when the `-t` command line option, known as `CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS` in libcurl, is used to send variable=content pairs to TELNET servers. Due to a flaw in the option parser for sending NEW_ENV variables, libcurl could be made to pass on uninitialized data from a stack based buffer to the server, resulting in potentially revealing sensitive internal information to the server using a clear-text network protocol. | |||||
| CVE-2006-3907 | 1 Siemens | 1 Speedstream Wireless Router | 2026-04-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Siemens SpeedStream 2624 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device hang) by sending a crafted packet to the web administrative interface. | |||||
| CVE-2005-2424 | 1 Siemens | 1 Santis 50 | 2026-04-16 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The management interface for Siemens SANTIS 50 running firmware 4.2.8.0, and possibly other products including Ericsson HN294dp and Dynalink RTA300W, allows remote attackers to access the Telnet port without authentication via certain packets to the web interface that cause the interface to freeze. | |||||
| CVE-2002-1484 | 1 Siemens | 1 Db4web | 2026-04-16 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| DB4Web server, when configured to use verbose debug messages, allows remote attackers to use DB4Web as a proxy and attempt TCP connections to other systems (port scan) via a request for a URL that specifies the target IP address and port, which produces a connection status in the resulting error message. | |||||