Search
Total
190105 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-31603 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM | ||
| NVIDIA DGX A100 contains a vulnerability in SBIOS in the IpSecDxe, where a user with high privileges and preconditioned IpSecDxe global data can exploit improper validation of an array index to cause code execution, which may lead to denial of service, data integrity impact, and information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31602 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM | ||
| NVIDIA DGX A100 contains a vulnerability in SBIOS in the IpSecDxe, where a user with elevated privileges and a preconditioned heap can exploit an out-of-bounds write vulnerability, which may lead to code execution, denial of service, data integrity impact, and information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31601 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM | ||
| NVIDIA DGX A100 contains a vulnerability in SBIOS in the SmbiosPei, which may allow a highly privileged local attacker to cause an out-of-bounds write, which may lead to code execution, denial of service, compromised integrity, and information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31600 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| NVIDIA DGX A100 contains a vulnerability in SBIOS in the SmmCore, where a user with high privileges can chain another vulnerability to this vulnerability, causing an integer overflow, possibly leading to code execution, escalation of privileges, denial of service, compromised integrity, and information disclosure. The scope of impact can extend to other components. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31599 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH | ||
| NVIDIA DGX A100 contains a vulnerability in SBIOS in the Ofbd, where a local user with elevated privileges can cause access to an uninitialized pointer, which may lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, denial of service, and information disclosure. The scope of impact can extend to other components. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44917 | 1 Gnuplot | 1 Gnuplot | 2022-07-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A Divide by Zero vulnerability exists in gnuplot 5.4 in the boundary3d function in graph3d.c, which could cause a Arithmetic exception and application crash. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34265 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.14 and 4.0 before 4.0.6. The Trunc() and Extract() database functions are subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as a kind/lookup_name value. Applications that constrain the lookup name and kind choice to a known safe list are unaffected. | |||||
| CVE-2022-33171 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** DISPUTED ** The findOne function in TypeORM before 0.3.0 can either be supplied with a string or a FindOneOptions object. When input to the function is a user-controlled parsed JSON object, supplying a crafted FindOneOptions instead of an id string leads to SQL injection. NOTE: the vendor's position is that the user's application is responsible for input validation. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2268 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The Import any XML or CSV File to WordPress plugin before 3.6.8 accepts all zip files and automatically extracts the zip file without validating the extracted file type. Allowing high privilege users such as admin to upload an arbitrary file like PHP, leading to RCE | |||||
| CVE-2022-1967 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The WP Championship WordPress plugin before 9.3 is lacking CSRF checks in various places, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin perform unwanted actions, such as create and delete arbitrary teams as well as update the plugin's settings. Due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping, it could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues | |||||
| CVE-2022-1946 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The Gallery WordPress plugin before 2.0.0 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the response of an AJAX action (available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users), leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting issue | |||||
| CVE-2022-1301 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The WP Contact Slider WordPress plugin before 2.4.7 does not sanitize and escape the Text to Display settings of sliders, which could allow high privileged users such as editor and above to perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html is disallowed | |||||
| CVE-2022-0250 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The Redirection for Contact Form 7 WordPress plugin before 2.5.0 does not escape a link generated before outputting it in an attribute, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting | |||||
| CVE-2021-25066 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The Ninja Forms Contact Form WordPress plugin before 3.6.10 does not sanitize and escape some imported data, allowing high privilege users to perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25056 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The Ninja Forms Contact Form WordPress plugin before 3.6.10 does not sanitise and escape field labels, allowing high privilege users to perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25121 | 1 Bestwebsoft | 1 Rating | 2022-07-04 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Rating by BestWebSoft WordPress plugin before 1.6 does not validate the submitted rating, allowing submission of long integer, causing a Denial of Service on the post/page when a user submit such rating | |||||
| CVE-2021-24485 | 1 Wp-special-textboxes Project | 1 Wp-special-textboxes | 2022-07-04 | 3.5 LOW | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| The Special Text Boxes WordPress plugin before 5.9.110 does not sanitise or escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users to perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html is disallowed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2301 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Buffer Over-read in GitHub repository hpjansson/chafa prior to 1.10.3. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2300 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Stored in GitHub repository microweber/microweber prior to 1.2.19. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34903 | 2022-07-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GnuPG through 2.3.6, in unusual situations where an attacker possesses any secret-key information from a victim's keyring and other constraints (e.g., use of GPGME) are met, allows signature forgery via injection into the status line. | |||||