Filtered by vendor Siemens
Subscribe
Total
2079 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-38879 | 1 Siemens | 1 Omnivise T3000 Application Server | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Omnivise T3000 Application Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP3 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP4 (All versions). The affected system exposes the port of an internal application on the public network interface allowing an attacker to circumvent authentication and directly access the exposed application. | |||||
| CVE-2024-38878 | 1 Siemens | 1 Omnivise T3000 Application Server | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Omnivise T3000 Application Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP3 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP4 (All versions). Affected devices allow authenticated users to export diagnostics data. The corresponding API endpoint is susceptible to path traversal and could allow an authenticated attacker to download arbitrary files from the file system. | |||||
| CVE-2024-38877 | 1 Siemens | 7 Omnivise T3000 Application Server, Omnivise T3000 Domain Controller, Omnivise T3000 Network Intrusion Detection System and 4 more | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Omnivise T3000 Application Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Domain Controller R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Product Data Management (PDM) R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP3 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP4 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Security Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Terminal Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Thin Client R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Whitelisting Server R9.2 (All versions). The affected devices stores initial system credentials without sufficient protection. An attacker with remote shell access or physical access could retrieve the credentials leading to confidentiality loss allowing the attacker to laterally move within the affected network. | |||||
| CVE-2024-38876 | 1 Siemens | 6 Omnivise T3000 Application Server, Omnivise T3000 Domain Controller, Omnivise T3000 Product Data Management and 3 more | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Omnivise T3000 Application Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Domain Controller R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Product Data Management (PDM) R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP3 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP4 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Terminal Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Thin Client R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Whitelisting Server R9.2 (All versions). The affected application regularly executes user modifiable code as a privileged user. This could allow a local authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2068 | 6 Broadcom, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 43 Sannav, Debian Linux, Fedora and 40 more | 2025-11-03 | 10.0 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
| In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze). | |||||
| CVE-2023-33919 | 1 Siemens | 3 Cp-8031 Master Module, Cp-8050 Master Module, Cpci85 Firmware | 2025-11-03 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in CP-8031 MASTER MODULE (All versions < CPCI85 V05), CP-8050 MASTER MODULE (All versions < CPCI85 V05). The web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated privileged remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22965 | 5 Cisco, Oracle, Siemens and 2 more | 39 Cx Cloud Agent, Commerce Platform, Communications Cloud Native Core Automated Test Suite and 36 more | 2025-10-30 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0708 | 3 Huawei, Microsoft, Siemens | 131 Agile Controller-campus, Agile Controller-campus Firmware, Bh620 V2 and 128 more | 2025-10-29 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unauthenticated attacker connects to the target system using RDP and sends specially crafted requests, aka 'Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2024-54091 | 1 Siemens | 3 Parasolid, Solid Edge Se2024, Solid Edge Se2025 | 2025-10-29 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Solid Edge SE2024 (All versions < V224.0 Update 12), Solid Edge SE2025 (All versions < V225.0 Update 3). The affected application contains an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing X_T data or a specially crafted file in X_T format. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44228 | 12 Apache, Apple, Bentley and 9 more | 167 Log4j, Xcode, Synchro and 164 more | 2025-10-27 | 9.3 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40438 | 11 Apache, Broadcom, Debian and 8 more | 40 Http Server, Brocade Fabric Operating System Firmware, Debian Linux and 37 more | 2025-10-27 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. | |||||
| CVE-2021-45046 | 7 Apache, Cvat, Debian and 4 more | 61 Log4j, Computer Vision Annotation Tool, Debian Linux and 58 more | 2025-10-27 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| It was found that the fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations. This could allows attackers with control over Thread Context Map (MDC) input data when the logging configuration uses a non-default Pattern Layout with either a Context Lookup (for example, $${ctx:loginId}) or a Thread Context Map pattern (%X, %mdc, or %MDC) to craft malicious input data using a JNDI Lookup pattern resulting in an information leak and remote code execution in some environments and local code execution in all environments. Log4j 2.16.0 (Java 8) and 2.12.2 (Java 7) fix this issue by removing support for message lookup patterns and disabling JNDI functionality by default. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41979 | 1 Siemens | 1 Opcenter Quality | 2025-10-23 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SmartClient modules Opcenter QL Home (SC) (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Audit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Cockpit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506). The affected application does not enforce mandatory authorization on some functionality level at server side. This could allow an authenticated attacker to gain complete access of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41980 | 1 Siemens | 1 Opcenter Quality | 2025-10-23 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SmartClient modules Opcenter QL Home (SC) (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Audit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Cockpit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506). The affected application do not encrypt the communication in LDAP interface by default. This could allow an authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41982 | 1 Siemens | 1 Opcenter Quality | 2025-10-23 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SmartClient modules Opcenter QL Home (SC) (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Audit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Cockpit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506). The affected application does not have adequate encryption of sensitive information. This could allow an authenticated attacker to gain access of sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41983 | 1 Siemens | 1 Opcenter Quality | 2025-10-23 | N/A | 3.5 LOW |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SmartClient modules Opcenter QL Home (SC) (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Audit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Cockpit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506). The affected application displays SQL statement in the error messages encountered during the generation of reports using Cockpit tool. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41986 | 1 Siemens | 1 Opcenter Quality | 2025-10-22 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SmartClient modules Opcenter QL Home (SC) (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Audit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Cockpit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506). The affected application support insecure TLS 1.0 and 1.1 protocol. An attacker could achieve a man-in-the-middle attack and compromise confidentiality and integrity of data. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41985 | 1 Siemens | 1 Opcenter Quality | 2025-10-22 | N/A | 2.6 LOW |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SmartClient modules Opcenter QL Home (SC) (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Audit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Cockpit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506). The affected application does not expire the session without logout. This could allow an attacker to get unauthorized access if the session is left idle. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41984 | 1 Siemens | 1 Opcenter Quality | 2025-10-22 | N/A | 2.6 LOW |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SmartClient modules Opcenter QL Home (SC) (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Audit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Cockpit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506). The affected application improperly handles error while accessing an inaccessible resource leading to exposing the system applications. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0160 | 13 Broadcom, Canonical, Debian and 10 more | 35 Symantec Messaging Gateway, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 32 more | 2025-10-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. | |||||