Total
2180 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-1654 | 1 Gpac | 1 Gpac | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Denial of Service in GitHub repository gpac/gpac prior to 2.4.0. | |||||
| CVE-2023-1605 | 1 Radare | 1 Radare2 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Denial of Service in GitHub repository radareorg/radare2 prior to 5.8.6. | |||||
| CVE-2023-1206 | 3 Fedoraproject, Linux, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| A hash collision flaw was found in the IPv6 connection lookup table in the Linux kernel’s IPv6 functionality when a user makes a new kind of SYN flood attack. A user located in the local network or with a high bandwidth connection can increase the CPU usage of the server that accepts IPV6 connections up to 95%. | |||||
| CVE-2023-1072 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 9.0 before 15.7.8, all versions starting from 15.8 before 15.8.4, all versions starting from 15.9 before 15.9.2. It was possible to trigger a resource depletion attack due to improper filtering for number of requests to read commits details. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0384 | 1 M-files | 1 M-files Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| User-controlled operations could have allowed Denial of Service in M-Files Server before 23.4.12528.1 due to uncontrolled memory consumption for a scheduled job. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0383 | 1 M-files | 1 M-files Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| User-controlled operations could have allowed Denial of Service in M-Files Server before 23.4.12528.1 due to uncontrolled memory consumption. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0382 | 1 M-files | 1 M-files Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| User-controlled operations could have allowed Denial of Service in M-Files Server before 23.4.12528.1 due to uncontrolled memory consumption. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4896 | 1 Cbm | 1 Control De Ciber | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| Cyber Control, in its 1.650 version, is affected by a vulnerability in the generation on the server of pop-up windows with the messages "PNTMEDIDAS", "PEDIR", "HAYDISCOA" or "SPOOLER". A complete denial of service can be achieved by sending multiple requests simultaneously on a core. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4816 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Safecenter | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| A denial-of-service vulnerability has been identified in Lenovo Safecenter that could allow a local user to crash the application. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4767 | 1 Usememos | 1 Memos | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Denial of Service in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.1. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4066 | 2 Mozilla, Onion Project | 2 Firefox, Onion | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 3.5 LOW |
| A vulnerability was found in davidmoreno onion. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is the function onion_response_flush of the file src/onion/response.c of the component Log Handler. The manipulation leads to allocation of resources. The name of the patch is de8ea938342b36c28024fd8393ebc27b8442a161. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-214028. | |||||
| CVE-2022-48564 | 2 Netapp, Python | 2 Active Iq Unified Manager, Python | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| read_ints in plistlib.py in Python through 3.9.1 is vulnerable to a potential DoS attack via CPU and RAM exhaustion when processing malformed Apple Property List files in binary format. | |||||
| CVE-2022-48475 | 1 Cbm | 1 Control De Ciber | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Control de Ciber version 1.650, in the printing function. Sending a modified request by the attacker could cause a Buffer Overflow when the adminitrator tries to accept or delete the print query created by the request. | |||||
| CVE-2022-48474 | 1 Cbm | 1 Control De Ciber | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| Control de Ciber, in its 1.650 version, is affected by a Denial of Service condition through the version function. Sending a malicious request could cause the server to check if an unrecognized component is up to date, causing a memory failure error that shuts down the process. | |||||
| CVE-2022-47696 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH | ||
| An issue was discovered Binutils objdump before 2.39.3 allows attackers to cause a denial of service or other unspecified impacts via function compare_symbols. | |||||
| CVE-2022-47695 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH | ||
| An issue was discovered Binutils objdump before 2.39.3 allows attackers to cause a denial of service or other unspecified impacts via function bfd_mach_o_get_synthetic_symtab in match-o.c. | |||||
| CVE-2022-47556 | 1 Ormazabal | 4 Ekorccp, Ekorccp Firmware, Ekorrci and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Uncontrolled resource consumption in ekorRCI, allowing an attacker with low-privileged access to the web server to send continuous legitimate web requests to a functionality that is not properly validated, in order to cause a denial of service (DoS) on the device. | |||||
| CVE-2022-46645 | 1 Intel | 1 Smart Campus | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| Uncontrolled resource consumption in the Intel(R) Smart Campus Android application before version 9.9 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45199 | 1 Python | 1 Pillow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Pillow before 9.3.0 allows denial of service via SAMPLESPERPIXEL. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45044 | 1 Siemens | 68 Siprotec 5 6md85, Siprotec 5 6md85 Firmware, Siprotec 5 6md86 and 65 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SA84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SD84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (All versions < V9.50 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (All versions < V9.50 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.50). Affected devices do not properly restrict secure client-initiated renegotiations within the SSL and TLS protocols. This could allow an attacker to create a denial of service condition on the ports 443/tcp and 4443/tcp for the duration of the attack. | |||||