Filtered by vendor Snort
Subscribe
Total
20 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-1417 | 1 Snort | 1 Snort | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Untrusted search path vulnerability in Snort 2.9.7.0-WIN32 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse tcapi.dll that is located in the same folder on a remote file share as a pcap file that is being processed. | |||||
| CVE-2009-3641 | 1 Snort | 1 Snort | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Snort before 2.8.5.1, when the -v option is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted IPv6 packet that uses the (1) TCP or (2) ICMP protocol. | |||||
| CVE-2008-1804 | 1 Snort | 1 Snort | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| preprocessors/spp_frag3.c in Sourcefire Snort before 2.8.1 does not properly identify packet fragments that have dissimilar TTL values, which allows remote attackers to bypass detection rules by using a different TTL for each fragment. | |||||
| CVE-2007-1398 | 2 Linux, Snort | 2 Linux Kernel, Snort | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 HIGH | N/A |
| The frag3 preprocessor in Snort 2.6.1.1, 2.6.1.2, and 2.7.0 beta, when configured for inline use on Linux without the ip_conntrack module loaded, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and application crash) via certain UDP packets produced by send_morefrag_packet and send_overlap_packet. | |||||
| CVE-2007-0251 | 1 Snort | 1 Snort | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| Integer underflow in the DecodeGRE function in src/decode.c in Snort 2.6.1.2 allows remote attackers to trigger dereferencing of certain memory locations via crafted GRE packets, which may cause corruption of log files or writing of sensitive information into log files. | |||||
| CVE-2006-6931 | 1 Snort | 1 Snort | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Algorithmic complexity vulnerability in Snort before 2.6.1, during predicate evaluation in rule matching for certain rules, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption and detection outage) via crafted network traffic, aka a "backtracking attack." | |||||
| CVE-2006-5276 | 2 Snort, Sourcefire | 2 Snort, Intrusion Sensor | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the DCE/RPC preprocessor in Snort before 2.6.1.3, and 2.7 before beta 2; and Sourcefire Intrusion Sensor; allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted SMB traffic. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0033 | 1 Snort | 1 Snort | 2024-11-20 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the RPC preprocessor for Snort 1.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via fragmented RPC packets. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1558 | 1 Snort | 1 Snort | 2024-11-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Unknown vulnerability in IP defragmenter (frag2) in Snort before 1.8.3 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash). | |||||
| CVE-2001-0669 | 4 Cisco, Enterasys, Iss and 1 more | 6 Catalyst 6000 Intrusion Detection System Module, Secure Intrusion Detection System, Dragon and 3 more | 2024-11-20 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Various Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) including (1) Cisco Secure Intrusion Detection System, (2) Cisco Catalyst 6000 Intrusion Detection System Module, (3) Dragon Sensor 4.x, (4) Snort before 1.8.1, (5) ISS RealSecure Network Sensor 5.x and 6.x before XPU 3.2, and (6) ISS RealSecure Server Sensor 5.5 and 6.0 for Windows, allow remote attackers to evade detection of HTTP attacks via non-standard "%u" Unicode encoding of ASCII characters in the requested URL. | |||||
| CVE-2000-1226 | 1 Snort | 1 Snort | 2024-11-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Snort 1.6, when running in straight ASCII packet logging mode or IDS mode with straight decoded ASCII packet logging selected, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) by sending non-IP protocols that Snort does not know about, as demonstrated by an nmap protocol scan. | |||||
| CVE-2023-20246 | 2 Cisco, Snort | 3 Firepower Threat Defense, Ios Xe, Snort | 2024-02-06 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in Snort access control policies that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured policies on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to a logic error that occurs when the access control policies are being populated. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by establishing a connection to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured access control rules on the affected system. | |||||
| CVE-2023-20071 | 2 Cisco, Snort | 5 Cyber Vision, Firepower Threat Defense, Meraki Mx Security Appliance Firmware and 2 more | 2024-02-05 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured policies on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to a flaw in the FTP module of the Snort detection engine. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted FTP traffic through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass FTP inspection and deliver a malicious payload. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40114 | 2 Cisco, Snort | 4 Firepower Management Center, Firepower Threat Defense, Unified Threat Defense and 1 more | 2024-02-04 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the way the Snort detection engine processes ICMP traffic that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper memory resource management while the Snort detection engine is processing ICMP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a series of ICMP packets through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust resources on the affected device, causing the device to reload. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40116 | 2 Cisco, Snort | 3 Firepower Management Center, Firepower Threat Defense, Snort | 2024-02-04 | 7.1 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in Snort rules that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device.The vulnerability is due to improper handling of the Block with Reset or Interactive Block with Reset actions if a rule is configured without proper constraints. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted IP packet to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause through traffic to be dropped. Note: Only products with Snort3 configured and either a rule with Block with Reset or Interactive Block with Reset actions configured are vulnerable. Products configured with Snort2 are not vulnerable. | |||||
| CVE-2021-1495 | 2 Cisco, Snort | 22 1100-4g\/6g Integrated Services Router, 1101 Integrated Services Router, 1109 Integrated Services Router and 19 more | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured file policy for HTTP. The vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of specific HTTP header parameters. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass a configured file policy for HTTP packets and deliver a malicious payload. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3299 | 2 Cisco, Snort | 16 1100-4p, 1100-8p, 1101-4p and 13 more | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured File Policy for HTTP. The vulnerability is due to incorrect detection of modified HTTP packets used in chunked responses. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass a configured File Policy for HTTP packets and deliver a malicious payload. | |||||
| CVE-2021-1224 | 2 Cisco, Snort | 43 1100-4p Integrated Services Router, 1100-8p Integrated Services Router, 1101-4p Integrated Services Router and 40 more | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability with TCP Fast Open (TFO) when used in conjunction with the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured file policy for HTTP. The vulnerability is due to incorrect detection of the HTTP payload if it is contained at least partially within the TFO connection handshake. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted TFO packets with an HTTP payload through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured file policy for HTTP packets and deliver a malicious payload. | |||||
| CVE-2021-1223 | 2 Cisco, Snort | 19 1100-4p Integrated Services Router, 1100-8p Integrated Services Router, 1101-4p Integrated Services Router and 16 more | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured file policy for HTTP. The vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of an HTTP range header. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured file policy for HTTP packets and deliver a malicious payload. | |||||
| CVE-2021-1236 | 2 Cisco, Snort | 19 1100-4p Integrated Services Router, 1100-8p Integrated Services Router, 1101-4p Integrated Services Router and 16 more | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort application detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured policies on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the detection algorithm. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets that would flow through an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the configured policies and deliver a malicious payload to the protected network. | |||||