Filtered by vendor Octopus
Subscribe
Total
83 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-2720 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-05-16 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that when a sensitive value is a substring of another value, sensitive value masking will only partially work. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2780 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-05-15 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to use the Git Connectivity test function on the VCS project to initiate an SMB request resulting in the potential for an NTLM relay attack. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2828 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-05-15 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to reveal information about teams via the API due to an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2022-2782 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-05-07 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for a session token to be valid indefinitely due to improper validation of the session token parameters. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2508 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-05-07 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to reveal the existence of resources in a space that the user does not have access to due to verbose error messaging. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2572 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-05-06 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server where access is managed by an external authentication provider, it was possible that the API key/keys of a disabled/deleted user were still valid after the access was revoked. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2721 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-04-25 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for target discovery to print certain values marked as sensitive to log files in plaint-text in when verbose logging is enabled. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11348 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2025-04-20 | 6.3 MEDIUM | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy 3.x before 3.15.4, an authenticated user with PackagePush permission to upload packages could upload a maliciously crafted NuGet package, potentially overwriting other packages or modifying system files. This is a directory traversal in the PackageId value. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15610 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2025-04-20 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Octopus before 3.17.7. When the special Guest user account is granted the CertificateExportPrivateKey permission, and Guest Access is enabled for the Octopus Server, an attacker can sign in as the Guest account and export Certificates managed by Octopus, including the private key. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16810 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2025-04-20 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the All Variables tab in Octopus Deploy 3.4.0-3.13.6 (fixed in 3.13.7) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Variable Set Name parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15609 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Octopus before 3.17.7 allows attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information by reading a variable JSON file in certain situations involving Offline Drop Targets. | |||||
| CVE-2017-17665 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Octopus Deploy before 4.1.3, the machine update process doesn't check that the user has access to all environments. This allows an access-control bypass because the set of environments to which a machine is scoped may include environments in which the user lacks access. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15611 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2025-04-20 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus before 3.17.7, an authenticated user who was explicitly granted the permission to invite new users (aka UserInvite) can invite users to teams with escalated privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16801 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2025-04-20 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Octopus Deploy 3.7.0-3.17.13 (fixed in 3.17.14) allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Step Template Name parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3460 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-04-10 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for certain types of sensitive variables to inadvertently become unmasked when viewed in variable preview. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3614 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-04-10 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy users of certain browsers using AD to sign-in to Octopus Server were able to bypass authentication checks and be redirected to the configured redirect url without any validation. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4898 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-03-27 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server the help sidebar can be customized to include a Cross-Site Scripting payload in the support link. This was initially resolved in advisory 2022-07 however it was identified that the fix could be bypassed in certain circumstances. A different approach was taken to prevent the possibility of the support link being susceptible to XSS | |||||
| CVE-2022-2883 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-03-11 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a zipbomb file as a task which results in Denial of Service | |||||
| CVE-2022-2259 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-03-03 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to view Workerpools without being explicitly assigned permissions to view these items | |||||
| CVE-2022-2258 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2025-02-27 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to view Tagsets without being explicitly assigned permissions to view these items | |||||