Filtered by vendor Nodejs
Subscribe
Total
153 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-32223 | 2 Microsoft, Nodejs | 2 Windows, Node.js | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| Node.js is vulnerable to Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Hijacking under certain conditions on Windows platforms.This vulnerability can be exploited if the victim has the following dependencies on a Windows machine:* OpenSSL has been installed and “C:\Program Files\Common Files\SSL\openssl.cnf” exists.Whenever the above conditions are present, `node.exe` will search for `providers.dll` in the current user directory.After that, `node.exe` will try to search for `providers.dll` by the DLL Search Order in Windows.It is possible for an attacker to place the malicious file `providers.dll` under a variety of paths and exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36046 | 2 Nodejs, Vercel | 2 Node.js, Next.js | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Next.js is a React framework that can provide building blocks to create web applications. All of the following must be true to be affected by this CVE: Next.js version 12.2.3, Node.js version above v15.0.0 being used with strict `unhandledRejection` exiting AND using next start or a [custom server](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/custom-server). Deployments on Vercel ([vercel.com](https://vercel.com/)) are not affected along with similar environments where `next-server` isn't being shared across requests. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32214 | 4 Debian, Llhttp, Nodejs and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Llhttp, Node.js and 1 more | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The llhttp parser <v14.20.1, <v16.17.1 and <v18.9.1 in the http module in Node.js does not strictly use the CRLF sequence to delimit HTTP requests. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS). | |||||
| CVE-2022-31151 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Undici | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Authorization headers are cleared on cross-origin redirect. However, cookie headers which are sensitive headers and are official headers found in the spec, remain uncleared. There are active users using cookie headers in undici. This may lead to accidental leakage of cookie to a 3rd-party site or a malicious attacker who can control the redirection target (ie. an open redirector) to leak the cookie to the 3rd party site. This was patched in v5.7.1. By default, this vulnerability is not exploitable. Do not enable redirections, i.e. `maxRedirections: 0` (the default). | |||||
| CVE-2022-31150 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Undici | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js. It is possible to inject CRLF sequences into request headers in undici in versions less than 5.7.1. A fix was released in version 5.8.0. Sanitizing all HTTP headers from untrusted sources to eliminate `\r\n` is a workaround for this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32222 | 2 Nodejs, Siemens | 2 Node.js, Sinec Ins | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A cryptographic vulnerability exists on Node.js on linux in versions of 18.x prior to 18.40.0 which allowed a default path for openssl.cnf that might be accessible under some circumstances to a non-admin user instead of /etc/ssl as was the case in versions prior to the upgrade to OpenSSL 3. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3602 | 4 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Nodejs and 1 more | 4 Fedora, Clustered Data Ontap, Node.js and 1 more | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6). | |||||
| CVE-2022-32212 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Nodejs and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Node.js and 1 more | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| A OS Command Injection vulnerability exists in Node.js versions <14.20.0, <16.20.0, <18.5.0 due to an insufficient IsAllowedHost check that can easily be bypassed because IsIPAddress does not properly check if an IP address is invalid before making DBS requests allowing rebinding attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44531 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2024-02-04 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44532 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 converts SANs (Subject Alternative Names) to a string format. It uses this string to check peer certificates against hostnames when validating connections. The string format was subject to an injection vulnerability when name constraints were used within a certificate chain, allowing the bypass of these name constraints.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this escape SANs containing the problematic characters in order to prevent the injection. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option. | |||||
| CVE-2022-21824 | 4 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 1 more | 11 Debian Linux, Oncommand Insight, Oncommand Workflow Automation and 8 more | 2024-02-04 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| Due to the formatting logic of the "console.table()" function it was not safe to allow user controlled input to be passed to the "properties" parameter while simultaneously passing a plain object with at least one property as the first parameter, which could be "__proto__". The prototype pollution has very limited control, in that it only allows an empty string to be assigned to numerical keys of the object prototype.Node.js >= 12.22.9, >= 14.18.3, >= 16.13.2, and >= 17.3.1 use a null protoype for the object these properties are being assigned to. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44533 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node's ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22930 | 4 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Nextgen Api, Node.js and 1 more | 2024-02-04 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Node.js before 16.6.0, 14.17.4, and 12.22.4 is vulnerable to a use after free attack where an attacker might be able to exploit the memory corruption, to change process behavior. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3672 | 6 C-ares Project, Fedoraproject, Nodejs and 3 more | 17 C-ares, Fedora, Node.js and 14 more | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 5.6 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in c-ares library, where a missing input validation check of host names returned by DNS (Domain Name Servers) can lead to output of wrong hostnames which might potentially lead to Domain Hijacking. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22931 | 4 Netapp, Nodejs, Oracle and 1 more | 10 Active Iq Unified Manager, Nextgen Api, Oncommand Insight and 7 more | 2024-02-04 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Node.js before 16.6.0, 14.17.4, and 12.22.4 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution, XSS, Application crashes due to missing input validation of host names returned by Domain Name Servers in Node.js dns library which can lead to output of wrong hostnames (leading to Domain Hijacking) and injection vulnerabilities in applications using the library. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22921 | 3 Microsoft, Nodejs, Siemens | 3 Windows, Node.js, Sinec Infrastructure Network Services | 2024-02-04 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Node.js before 16.4.1, 14.17.2, and 12.22.2 is vulnerable to local privilege escalation attacks under certain conditions on Windows platforms. More specifically, improper configuration of permissions in the installation directory allows an attacker to perform two different escalation attacks: PATH and DLL hijacking. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22939 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 2 more | 8 Debian Linux, Nextgen Api, Node.js and 5 more | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| If the Node.js https API was used incorrectly and "undefined" was in passed for the "rejectUnauthorized" parameter, no error was returned and connections to servers with an expired certificate would have been accepted. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22940 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 2 more | 7 Debian Linux, Nextgen Api, Node.js and 4 more | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Node.js before 16.6.1, 14.17.5, and 12.22.5 is vulnerable to a use after free attack where an attacker might be able to exploit the memory corruption, to change process behavior. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22918 | 2 Nodejs, Siemens | 2 Node.js, Sinec Infrastructure Network Services | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Node.js before 16.4.1, 14.17.2, 12.22.2 is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read when uv__idna_toascii() is used to convert strings to ASCII. The pointer p is read and increased without checking whether it is beyond pe, with the latter holding a pointer to the end of the buffer. This can lead to information disclosures or crashes. This function can be triggered via uv_getaddrinfo(). | |||||
| CVE-2020-8252 | 3 Fedoraproject, Nodejs, Opensuse | 3 Fedora, Node.js, Leap | 2024-02-04 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| The implementation of realpath in libuv < 10.22.1, < 12.18.4, and < 14.9.0 used within Node.js incorrectly determined the buffer size which can result in a buffer overflow if the resolved path is longer than 256 bytes. | |||||