Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscribe
Filtered by product Jboss Enterprise Application Platform
Subscribe
Total
233 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2010-3862 | 1 Redhat | 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Web Platform, Jboss Remoting | 2025-04-11 | 2.6 LOW | N/A |
| The org.jboss.remoting.transport.bisocket.BisocketServerInvoker$SecondaryServerSocketThread.run method in JBoss Remoting 2.2.x before 2.2.3.SP4 and 2.5.x before 2.5.3.SP2 in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3 through 4.3.0.CP09, and 5.1.0; and JBoss Enterprise Web Platform (aka JBEWP) 5.1.0; allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) by establishing a bisocket control connection TCP session, and then not sending any application data. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5478 | 1 Redhat | 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Web Platform | 2025-04-11 | 4.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The AuthorizationInterceptor in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 does not properly restrict access, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended role restrictions and perform arbitrary JMX operations via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2010-4265 | 1 Redhat | 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Web Platform, Jboss Remoting | 2025-04-11 | 2.6 LOW | N/A |
| The org.jboss.remoting.transport.bisocket.BisocketServerInvoker$SecondaryServerSocketThread.run method in JBoss Remoting 2.2.x before 2.2.3.SP4 and 2.5.x before 2.5.3.SP2 in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3 through 4.3.0.CP09 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) by establishing a bisocket control connection TCP session, and then not sending any application data, related to a missing CVE-2010-3862 patch. NOTE: this can be considered a duplicate of CVE-2010-3862 because a missing patch should not be assigned a separate CVE identifier. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4605 | 1 Redhat | 5 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The (1) JNDI service, (2) HA-JNDI service, and (3) HAJNDIFactory invoker servlet in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 CP10 and 5.1.2, Web Platform 5.1.2, SOA Platform 4.2.0.CP05 and 4.3.0.CP05, Portal Platform 4.3 CP07 and 5.2.x before 5.2.2, and BRMS Platform before 5.3.0 do not properly restrict write access, which allows remote attackers to add, delete, or modify items in a JNDI tree via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5629 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Web Platform | 2025-04-11 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The default configuration of the (1) LdapLoginModule and (2) LdapExtLoginModule modules in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 4.3.0 CP10, 5.2.0, and 6.0.1, and Enterprise Web Platform (EWP) 5.2.0 allow remote attackers to bypass authentication via an empty password. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2196 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform, Jboss Enterprise Web Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| jboss-seam.jar in the JBoss Seam 2 framework 2.2.x and earlier, as distributed in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4.3.0.CP05 and 5.1.0; JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3.0, 4.3.0.CP09, and 5.1.1; and JBoss Enterprise Web Platform 5.1.1, does not properly restrict use of Expression Language (EL) statements in FacesMessages during page exception handling, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted URL to an application. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-1484. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4314 | 3 Kay Framework Project, Openid, Redhat | 3 Kay Framework, Openid4java, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2025-04-11 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| message/ax/AxMessage.java in OpenID4Java before 0.9.6 final, as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1 before 5.1.2, Step2, Kay Framework before 1.0.2, and possibly other products does not verify that Attribute Exchange (AX) information is signed, which allows remote attackers to modify potentially sensitive AX information without detection via a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. | |||||
| CVE-2012-4549 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2025-04-11 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The processInvocation function in org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.AuthorizationInterceptor in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) before 6.0.1, authorizes all requests when no roles are allowed for an Enterprise Java Beans (EJB) method invocation, which allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions for EJB methods. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3143 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Wildfly Elytron | 2025-04-09 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| wildfly-elytron: possible timing attacks via use of unsafe comparator. A flaw was found in Wildfly-elytron. Wildfly-elytron uses java.util.Arrays.equals in several places, which is unsafe and vulnerable to timing attacks. To compare values securely, use java.security.MessageDigest.isEqual instead. This flaw allows an attacker to access secure information or impersonate an authed user. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2405 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2025-04-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Web Console in the Application Server in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2.0 before 4.2.0.CP08, 4.2.2GA, 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP07, and 5.1.0GA allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) monitorName, (2) objectName, (3) attribute, or (4) period parameter to createSnapshot.jsp, or the (5) monitorName, (6) objectName, (7) attribute, (8) threshold, (9) period, or (10) enabled parameter to createThresholdMonitor.jsp. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. | |||||
| CVE-2009-1380 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2025-04-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in JMX-Console in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP08 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP07 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the filter parameter, related to the key property and the position of quote and colon characters. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3519 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2025-04-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The default configuration of the JBossAs component in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBossEAP or EAP), possibly 4.2 before CP04 and 4.3 before CP02, when a production environment is enabled, sets the DownloadServerClasses property to true, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information (non-EJB classes) via a download request, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3273. | |||||
| CVE-2009-3554 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2025-04-09 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| Twiddle in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP08 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP07 writes the JMX password, and other command-line arguments, to the twiddle.log file, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading this file. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0027 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2025-04-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The request handler in JBossWS in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP06 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP04 does not properly validate the resource path during a request for a WSDL file with a custom web-service endpoint, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary XML files via a crafted request. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4492 | 1 Redhat | 10 Build Of Quarkus, Integration Camel For Spring Boot, Integration Camel K and 7 more | 2025-03-12 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9516 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 21 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 18 more | 2025-01-14 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9513 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 22 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 19 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 30 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 27 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9518 | 11 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 8 more | 20 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 17 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9517 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 25 Http Server, Traffic Server, Mac Os X and 22 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | |||||