Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Filtered by vendor Redhat Subscribe
Filtered by product Jboss Enterprise Application Platform
Total 233 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2012-0034 1 Redhat 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Web Platform 2025-04-11 2.1 LOW N/A
The NonManagedConnectionFactory in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 5.1.2 and 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) 5.1.2 and 5.2.0, and BRMS Platform before 5.3.1 logs the username and password in cleartext when an exception is thrown, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the log file.
CVE-2013-0218 1 Redhat 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Web Platform 2025-04-11 2.1 LOW N/A
The GUI installer in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) and Enterprise Web Platform (EWP) 5.2.0 and possibly 5.1.2 uses world-readable permissions for the auto-install XML file, which allows local users to obtain the administrator password and the sucker password by reading this file.
CVE-2013-4128 1 Redhat 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2025-04-11 6.4 MEDIUM N/A
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.1.0 does not properly cache EJB invocations by remote-naming, which allows remote attackers to hijack sessions by using a remoting client.
CVE-2012-1154 1 Redhat 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Mod Cluster 2025-04-11 4.3 MEDIUM N/A
mod_cluster 1.0.10 before 1.0.10 CP03 and 1.1.x before 1.1.4, as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1.2, when "ROOT" is set to excludedContexts, exposes the root context of the server, which allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions and gain access to applications deployed on the root context via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2014-0018 1 Redhat 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Wildfly Application Server 2025-04-11 1.9 LOW N/A
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBEAP) 6.2.0 and JBoss WildFly Application Server, when run under a security manager, do not properly restrict access to the Modular Service Container (MSC) service registry, which allows local users to modify the server via a crafted deployment.
CVE-2012-4572 1 Redhat 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform 2025-04-11 3.7 LOW N/A
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 6.1.0 and JBoss Portal before 6.1.0 does not load the implementation of a custom authorization module for a new application when an implementation is already loaded and the modules share class names, which allows local users to control certain applications' authorization decisions via a crafted application.
CVE-2009-5066 1 Redhat 2 Jboss Community Application Server, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2025-04-11 2.1 LOW N/A
twiddle.sh in JBoss AS 5.0 and EAP 5.0 and earlier accepts credentials as command-line arguments, which allows local users to read the credentials by listing the process and its arguments.
CVE-2012-3369 1 Redhat 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Web Platform 2025-04-11 4.0 MEDIUM N/A
The CallerIdentityLoginModule in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 allows remote attackers to gain privileges of the previous user via a null password, which causes the previous user's password to be used.
CVE-2011-4085 1 Redhat 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform and 1 more 2025-04-11 6.8 MEDIUM N/A
The servlets invoked by httpha-invoker in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform before 5.1.2, SOA Platform before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.0, and Portal Platform before 4.3 CP07 perform access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allow remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending a request with a different method. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of a CVE-2010-0738 regression.
CVE-2013-4210 1 Redhat 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform and 1 more 2025-04-11 5.0 MEDIUM N/A
The org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread class in Red Hat JBoss Remoting for Red Hat JBoss SOA Platform 5.3.1 GA, Web Platform 5.2.0, Enterprise Application Platform 5.2.0, and other products allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (file descriptor consumption) via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2012-0874 1 Redhat 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Web Platform 2025-04-11 6.8 MEDIUM N/A
The (1) JMXInvokerHAServlet and (2) EJBInvokerHAServlet invoker servlets in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 do not require authentication by default in certain profiles, which might allow remote attackers to invoke MBean methods and execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. NOTE: this issue can only be exploited when the interceptor is not properly configured with a "second layer of authentication," or when used in conjunction with other vulnerabilities that bypass this second layer.
CVE-2011-1483 2 Hp, Redhat 7 Network Node Manager I, Jboss Communications Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more 2025-04-11 5.0 MEDIUM N/A
wsf/common/DOMUtils.java in JBossWS Native in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.2.0.CP09, 4.3, and 5.1.1; JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 4.3.CP06 and 5.1.1; JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4.2.CP05, 4.3.CP05, and 5.1.0; JBoss Communications Platform 1.2.11 and 5.1.1; JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5.1.0; and JBoss Enterprise Web Platform 5.1.1 does not properly handle recursion during entity expansion, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption) via a crafted request containing an XML document with a DOCTYPE declaration and a large number of nested entity references, a similar issue to CVE-2003-1564.
CVE-2011-1484 1 Redhat 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform, Jboss Seam 2 Framework 2025-04-11 6.8 MEDIUM N/A
jboss-seam.jar in the JBoss Seam 2 framework 2.2.x and earlier, as distributed in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4.3.0.CP04 and 5.1.0 and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3.0.CP09 and 5.1.0, does not properly restrict use of Expression Language (EL) statements in FacesMessages during page exception handling, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted URL to an application.
CVE-2011-4608 1 Redhat 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2025-04-11 7.5 HIGH N/A
mod_cluster in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1.2 for Red Hat Linux allows worker nodes to register with arbitrary virtual hosts, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and provide malicious content, hijack sessions, and steal credentials by registering from an external vhost that does not enforce security constraints.
CVE-2012-1167 1 Redhat 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform and 1 more 2025-04-11 4.6 MEDIUM N/A
The JBoss Server in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1.x before 5.1.2 and 5.2.x before 5.2.2, Web Platform before 5.1.2, BRMS Platform before 5.3.0, and SOA Platform before 5.3.0, when the server is configured to use the JaccAuthorizationRealm and the ignoreBaseDecision property is set to true on the JBossWebRealm, does not properly check the permissions created by the WebPermissionMapping class, which allows remote authenticated users to access arbitrary applications.
CVE-2010-3708 1 Redhat 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform 2025-04-11 7.5 HIGH N/A
The serialization implementation in JBoss Drools in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP09 and JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4.2 and 4.3 supports the embedding of class files, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted static initializer.
CVE-2013-4112 2 Jgroups, Redhat 2 Jgroup, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2025-04-11 5.4 MEDIUM N/A
The DiagnosticsHandler in JGroup 3.0.x, 3.1.x, 3.2.x before 3.2.9, and 3.3.x before 3.3.3 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information (diagnostic information) and execute arbitrary code by reusing valid credentials.
CVE-2013-2133 1 Redhat 2 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2025-04-11 5.5 MEDIUM N/A
The EJB invocation handler implementation in Red Hat JBossWS, as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 6.2.0, does not properly enforce the method level restrictions for JAX-WS Service endpoints, which allows remote authenticated users to access otherwise restricted JAX-WS handlers by leveraging permissions to the EJB class.
CVE-2012-5575 2 Apache, Redhat 6 Cxf, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform and 3 more 2025-04-11 6.4 MEDIUM N/A
Apache CXF 2.5.x before 2.5.10, 2.6.x before CXF 2.6.7, and 2.7.x before CXF 2.7.4 does not verify that a specified cryptographic algorithm is allowed by the WS-SecurityPolicy AlgorithmSuite definition before decrypting, which allows remote attackers to force CXF to use weaker cryptographic algorithms than intended and makes it easier to decrypt communications, aka "XML Encryption backwards compatibility attack."
CVE-2013-2185 2 Apache, Redhat 3 Tomcat, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform 2025-04-11 7.5 HIGH N/A
** DISPUTED ** The readObject method in the DiskFileItem class in Apache Tomcat and JBoss Web, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.0 and Red Hat JBoss Portal 6.0.0, allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a NULL byte in a file name in a serialized instance, a similar issue to CVE-2013-2186. NOTE: this issue is reportedly disputed by the Apache Tomcat team, although Red Hat considers it a vulnerability. The dispute appears to regard whether it is the responsibility of applications to avoid providing untrusted data to be deserialized, or whether this class should inherently protect against this issue.