Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscribe
Total
5516 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-7844 | 3 Bsd Mailx Project, Debian, Redhat | 8 Bsd Mailx, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| BSD mailx 8.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted email address. | |||||
| CVE-2014-5118 | 3 Fedoraproject, Redhat, Trusted Boot Project | 3 Fedora, Enterprise Linux, Trusted Boot | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Trusted Boot (tboot) before 1.8.2 has a 'loader.c' Security Bypass Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2014-4967 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Multiple argument injection vulnerabilities in Ansible before 1.6.7 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging access to an Ansible managed host and providing a crafted fact, as demonstrated by a fact with (1) a trailing " src=" clause, (2) a trailing " temp=" clause, or (3) a trailing " validate=" clause accompanied by a shell command. | |||||
| CVE-2014-4966 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Ansible before 1.6.7 does not prevent inventory data with "{{" and "lookup" substrings, and does not prevent remote data with "{{" substrings, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) crafted lookup('pipe') calls or (2) crafted Jinja2 data. | |||||
| CVE-2014-4678 | 2 Debian, Redhat | 2 Debian Linux, Ansible | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The safe_eval function in Ansible before 1.6.4 does not properly restrict the code subset, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted instructions. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-4657. | |||||
| CVE-2014-4660 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Ansible before 1.5.5 constructs filenames containing user and password fields on the basis of deb lines in sources.list, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive credential information in opportunistic circumstances by leveraging existence of a file that uses the "deb http://user:pass@server:port/" format. | |||||
| CVE-2014-4659 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Ansible before 1.5.5 sets 0644 permissions for sources.list, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive credential information in opportunistic circumstances by reading a file that uses the "deb http://user:pass@server:port/" format. | |||||
| CVE-2014-4658 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The vault subsystem in Ansible before 1.5.5 does not set the umask before creation or modification of a vault file, which allows local users to obtain sensitive key information by reading a file. | |||||
| CVE-2014-4657 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The safe_eval function in Ansible before 1.5.4 does not properly restrict the code subset, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted instructions. | |||||
| CVE-2014-4650 | 2 Python, Redhat | 3 Python, Enterprise Linux, Software Collections | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The CGIHTTPServer module in Python 2.7.5 and 3.3.4 does not properly handle URLs in which URL encoding is used for path separators, which allows remote attackers to read script source code or conduct directory traversal attacks and execute unintended code via a crafted character sequence, as demonstrated by a %2f separator. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3701 | 1 Redhat | 2 Edeploy, Jboss Enterprise Web Server | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| eDeploy has tmp file race condition flaws | |||||
| CVE-2014-3700 | 1 Redhat | 2 Edeploy, Jboss Enterprise Web Server | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| eDeploy through at least 2014-10-14 has remote code execution due to eval() of untrusted data | |||||
| CVE-2014-3699 | 1 Redhat | 2 Edeploy, Jboss Enterprise Web Server | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| eDeploy has RCE via cPickle deserialization of untrusted data | |||||
| CVE-2014-3656 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Keycloak | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| JBoss KeyCloak: XSS in login-status-iframe.html | |||||
| CVE-2014-3655 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Enterprise Web Server, Keycloak | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| JBoss KeyCloak is vulnerable to soft token deletion via CSRF | |||||
| CVE-2014-3652 | 1 Redhat | 1 Keycloak | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| JBoss KeyCloak: Open redirect vulnerability via failure to validate the redirect URL. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3650 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Aerogear | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Multiple persistent cross-site scripting (XSS) flaws were found in the way Aerogear handled certain user-supplied content. A remote attacker could use these flaws to compromise the application with specially crafted input. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3649 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Aerogear | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| JBoss AeroGear has reflected XSS via the password field | |||||
| CVE-2014-3648 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Aerogear | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The simplepush server iterates through the application installations and pushes a notification to the server provided by deviceToken. But this is user controlled. If a bogus applications is registered with bad deviceTokens, one can generate endless exceptions when those endpoints can't be reached or can slow the server down by purposefully wasting it's time with slow endpoints. Similarly, one can provide whatever HTTP end point they want. This turns the server into a DDOS vector or an anonymizer for the posting of malware and so on. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3599 | 1 Redhat | 1 Hornetq | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| HornetQ REST is vulnerable to XML External Entity due to insecure configuration of RestEasy | |||||