Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Filtered by vendor Sendmail Subscribe
Total 33 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2002-0906 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2024-11-20 7.5 HIGH N/A
Buffer overflow in Sendmail before 8.12.5, when configured to use a custom DNS map to query TXT records, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a malicious DNS server.
CVE-2001-1349 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2024-11-20 3.7 LOW N/A
Sendmail before 8.11.4, and 8.12.0 before 8.12.0.Beta10, allows local users to cause a denial of service and possibly corrupt the heap and gain privileges via race conditions in signal handlers.
CVE-2001-0715 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2024-11-20 2.1 LOW N/A
Sendmail before 8.12.1, without the RestrictQueueRun option enabled, allows local users to obtain potentially sensitive information about the mail queue by setting debugging flags to enable debug mode.
CVE-2001-0714 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2024-11-20 2.1 LOW N/A
Sendmail before 8.12.1, without the RestrictQueueRun option enabled, allows local users to cause a denial of service (data loss) by (1) setting a high initial message hop count option (-h), which causes Sendmail to drop queue entries, (2) via the -qR option, or (3) via the -qS option.
CVE-2001-0713 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2024-11-20 4.6 MEDIUM N/A
Sendmail before 8.12.1 does not properly drop privileges when the -C option is used to load custom configuration files, which allows local users to gain privileges via malformed arguments in the configuration file whose names contain characters with the high bit set, such as (1) macro names that are one character long, (2) a variable setting which is processed by the setoption function, or (3) a Modifiers setting which is processed by the getmodifiers function.
CVE-2001-0653 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2024-11-20 4.6 MEDIUM N/A
Sendmail 8.10.0 through 8.11.5, and 8.12.0 beta, allows local users to modify process memory and possibly gain privileges via a large value in the 'category' part of debugger (-d) command line arguments, which is interpreted as a negative number.
CVE-1999-1592 2 Sendmail, Sun 2 Sendmail, Sunos 2024-11-20 7.5 HIGH N/A
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in sendmail 5, as installed on Sun SunOS 4.1.3_U1 and 4.1.4, have unspecified attack vectors and impact. NOTE: this might overlap CVE-1999-0129.
CVE-1999-1580 2 Sendmail, Sun 2 Sendmail, Sunos 2024-11-20 7.2 HIGH N/A
SunOS sendmail 5.59 through 5.65 uses popen to process a forwarding host argument, which allows local users to gain root privileges by modifying the IFS (Internal Field Separator) variable and passing crafted values to the -oR option.
CVE-1999-1309 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2024-11-20 7.2 HIGH N/A
Sendmail before 8.6.7 allows local users to gain root access via a large value in the debug (-d) command line option.
CVE-1999-1109 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2024-11-20 5.0 MEDIUM N/A
Sendmail before 8.10.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a series of ETRN commands then disconnecting from the server, while Sendmail continues to process the commands after the connection has been terminated.
CVE-1999-0478 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2024-11-20 5.0 MEDIUM N/A
Denial of service in HP-UX sendmail 8.8.6 related to accepting connections.
CVE-2023-51765 3 Freebsd, Redhat, Sendmail 3 Freebsd, Enterprise Linux, Sendmail 2024-06-15 N/A 5.3 MEDIUM
sendmail through 8.17.2 allows SMTP smuggling in certain configurations. Remote attackers can use a published exploitation technique to inject e-mail messages with a spoofed MAIL FROM address, allowing bypass of an SPF protection mechanism. This occurs because sendmail supports <LF>.<CR><LF> but some other popular e-mail servers do not. This is resolved in 8.18 and later versions with 'o' in srv_features.
CVE-2021-3618 4 F5, Fedoraproject, Sendmail and 1 more 4 Nginx, Fedora, Sendmail and 1 more 2024-02-04 5.8 MEDIUM 7.4 HIGH
ALPACA is an application layer protocol content confusion attack, exploiting TLS servers implementing different protocols but using compatible certificates, such as multi-domain or wildcard certificates. A MiTM attacker having access to victim's traffic at the TCP/IP layer can redirect traffic from one subdomain to another, resulting in a valid TLS session. This breaks the authentication of TLS and cross-protocol attacks may be possible where the behavior of one protocol service may compromise the other at the application layer.