Total
7961 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-3261 | 1 Cisco | 34 6300 Series Access Points, 6300 Series Access Points Firmware, Aironet 1542d and 31 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Mobility Express Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user with an active session on an affected device to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions, including modifying the configuration, with the privilege level of the user. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3148 | 1 Cisco | 1 Prime Network Registrar | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the web-based interface of Cisco Prime Network Registrar (CPNR) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections in the web-based interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a targeted user, with an active administrative session on the affected device, to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to change the device's configuration, which could include the ability to edit or create user accounts of any privilege level. Some changes to the device's configuration could negatively impact the availability of networking services for other devices on networks managed by CPNR. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3135 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Communications Manager | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (UCM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3124 | 1 Cisco | 1 Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web-based interface of Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment (HCM-F) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a targeted user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary requests that could change the password of a targeted user. An attacker could then take unauthorized actions on behalf of the targeted user. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3114 | 1 Cisco | 1 Data Center Network Manager | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link while having an active session on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36761 | 1 Webberzone | 1 Top 10 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Top 10 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.10.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the tptn_export_tables() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to generate an export of the top 10 table via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36760 | 1 Oceanwp | 1 Ocean Extra | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Ocean Extra plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.6.5]. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the add_core_extensions_bundle_validation() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to validate extension bundles via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36759 | 1 Cm-wp | 1 Woody Code Snippets | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Woody code snippets plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.3.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the runActions() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to activate and deactivate snippets via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36758 | 1 Themeisle | 1 Rss Aggregator By Feedzy | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The RSS Aggregator by Feedzy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_feedzy_post_type_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update post meta via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36757 | 1 Thimpress | 1 Wp Hotel Booking | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The WP Hotel Booking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.10.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admin_add_order_item() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add an order item via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36756 | 1 10web | 1 10webanalytics | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The 10WebAnalytics plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.2.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the create_csv_file() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create a CSV file via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36755 | 1 Presscustomizr | 1 Customizr | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Customizr theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 4.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the czr_fn_post_fields_save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to post fields via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36754 | 1 Strangerstudios | 1 Paid Memberships Pro | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Paid Memberships Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the pmpro_page_save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save pages via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36753 | 1 Presscustomizr | 1 Hueman | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Hueman theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.6.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_meta_box() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save metabox data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36752 | 1 Wpconcern | 1 Coming Soon \& Maintenance Mode Page | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.57. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_meta_box() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save meta boxes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36751 | 1 Jesseeproductions | 1 Coupon Creator | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Coupon Creator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save meta fields via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36750 | 1 Ewww | 1 Image Optimizer | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The EWWW Image Optimizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 5.8.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ewww_ngg_bulk_init() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform bulk image optimization via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36749 | 1 Goldplugins | 1 Easy Testimonials | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Easy Testimonials plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.6.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the saveCustomFields() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save custom fields via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36748 | 1 Wedevs | 1 Dokan | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Dokan plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.0.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the handle_order_export() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger an order export via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36747 | 1 Brainstormforce | 1 Lightweight Sidebar Manager | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Lightweight Sidebar Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the metabox_save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save metbox data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||