Total
10018 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2013-5919 | 2 Oisf, Openinfosecfoundation | 2 Suricata, Suricata | 2024-10-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Suricata before 1.4.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a malformed SSL record. | |||||
| CVE-2022-47353 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 7 Android, S8000, T610 and 4 more | 2024-10-27 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| In vdsp device, there is a possible system crash due to improper input validation.This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed | |||||
| CVE-2023-6395 | 2 Fedoraproject, Rpm-software-management | 3 Extra Packages For Enterprise Linux, Fedora, Mock | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The Mock software contains a vulnerability wherein an attacker could potentially exploit privilege escalation, enabling the execution of arbitrary code with root user privileges. This weakness stems from the absence of proper sandboxing during the expansion and execution of Jinja2 templates, which may be included in certain configuration parameters. While the Mock documentation advises treating users added to the mock group as privileged, certain build systems invoking mock on behalf of users might inadvertently permit less privileged users to define configuration tags. These tags could then be passed as parameters to mock during execution, potentially leading to the utilization of Jinja2 templates for remote privilege escalation and the execution of arbitrary code as the root user on the build server. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20274 | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software, formerly Firepower Management Center Software, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to inject arbitrary HTML content into a device-generated document. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied data. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting malicious content to an affected device and using the device to generate a document that contains sensitive information. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to alter the standard layout of the device-generated documents, access arbitrary files from the underlying operating system, and conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need valid credentials for a user account with policy-editing permissions, such as Network Admin, Intrusion Admin, or any custom user role with the same capabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45031 | 2024-10-25 | N/A | N/A | ||
| When editing objects in the Syncope Console, incomplete HTML tags could be used to bypass HTML sanitization. This made it possible to inject stored XSS payloads which would trigger for other users during ordinary usage of the application. XSS payloads could also be injected in Syncope Enduser when editing “Personal Information” or “User Requests”: such payloads would trigger for administrators in Syncope Console, thus enabling session hijacking. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.0.9, which fixes this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20495 | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH | ||
| A vulnerability in the Remote Access VPN feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of client key data after the TLS session is established. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted key value to an affected system over the secure TLS session. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20464 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2024-10-24 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of received IPv4 PIMv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted PIMv2 packet to a PIM-enabled interface on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause an affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited with either an IPv4 multicast or unicast packet. | |||||
| CVE-2024-3150 | 1 Mintplexlabs | 1 Anythingllm | 2024-10-24 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| In mintplex-labs/anything-llm, a vulnerability exists in the thread update process that allows users with Default or Manager roles to escalate their privileges to Administrator. The issue arises from improper input validation when handling HTTP POST requests to the endpoint `/workspace/:slug/thread/:threadSlug/update`. Specifically, the application fails to validate or check user input before passing it to the `workspace_thread` Prisma model for execution. This oversight allows attackers to craft a Prisma relation query operation that manipulates the `users` model to change a user's role to admin. Successful exploitation grants attackers the highest level of user privileges, enabling them to see and perform all actions within the system. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000021 | 1 Git-scm | 1 Git | 2024-10-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| GIT version 2.15.1 and earlier contains a Input Validation Error vulnerability in Client that can result in problems including messing up terminal configuration to RCE. This attack appear to be exploitable via The user must interact with a malicious git server, (or have their traffic modified in a MITM attack). | |||||
| CVE-2023-42776 | 1 Intel | 1 Sgx Dcap | 2024-10-24 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Improper input validation in some Intel(R) SGX DCAP software for Windows before version 1.19.100.3 may allow an authenticateed user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2023-25696 | 1 Apache | 1 Apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive | 2024-10-23 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in the Apache Airflow Hive Provider. This issue affects Apache Airflow Hive Provider versions before 5.1.3. | |||||
| CVE-2023-20063 | 1 Cisco | 2 Firepower Management Center, Firepower Threat Defense | 2024-10-23 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the inter-device communication mechanisms between devices that are running Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software and devices that are running Cisco Firepower Management (FMC) Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root permissions on the underlying operating system of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing the expert mode of an affected device and submitting specific commands to a connected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of an FMC device if the attacker has administrative privileges on an associated FTD device. Alternatively, a successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of an FTD device if the attacker has administrative privileges on an associated FMC device. | |||||
| CVE-2023-28707 | 1 Apache | 1 Apache-airflow-providers-apache-drill | 2024-10-23 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Airflow Drill Provider.This issue affects Apache Airflow Drill Provider: before 2.3.2. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43713 | 1 Gxsoftware | 1 Xperiencentral | 2024-10-23 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Interactive Forms (IAF) in GX Software XperienCentral versions 10.33.1 until 10.35.0 was vulnerable to invalid data input because form validation could be bypassed. | |||||
| CVE-2024-49368 | 2024-10-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. Prior to version 2.0.0-beta.36, when Nginx UI configures logrotate, it does not verify the input and directly passes it to exec.Command, causing arbitrary command execution. Version 2.0.0-beta.36 fixes this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48919 | 2024-10-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. Prior to Sep 27, 2024, if a user generated a terminal command via Cursor's Terminal Cmd-K/Ctrl-K feature and if the user explicitly imported a malicious web page into the Terminal Cmd-K prompt, an attacker with control over the referenced web page could have a significant chance of influencing a language model to output arbitrary commands for execution in the user's terminal. This scenario would require the user explicitly opt-in to including the contents of a compromised webpage, and it would require that the attacker display prompt injection text in the the contents of the compromised webpage. A server-side patch to not stream back newlines or control characters was released on September 27, 2024, within two hours of the issue being reported. Additionally, Cursor 0.42 includes client-side mitigations to prevent any newline or control character from being streamed into the terminal directly. It also contains a new setting, `"cursor.terminal.usePreviewBox"`, which, if set to true, streams the response into a preview box whose contents then have to be manually accepted before being inserted into the terminal. This setting is useful if you're working in a shell environment where commands can be executed without pressing enter or any control character. The patch has been applied server-side, so no additional action is needed, even on older versions of Cursor. Separately, Cursor's maintainers also recommend, as best practice, to only include trusted pieces of context in prompts. | |||||
| CVE-2024-38265 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 and 3 more | 2024-10-22 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-38261 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 and 3 more | 2024-10-22 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-43593 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 and 3 more | 2024-10-22 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-43592 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 and 3 more | 2024-10-22 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||