Total
94077 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-54369 | 2025-07-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Reason: This candidate was issued in error. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9190 | 1 Schneider-electric | 1 Wonderware Intouch Access Anywhere Server | 2025-07-24 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Schneider Electric Wonderware InTouch Access Anywhere Server 10.6 and 11.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a request for a filename that does not exist. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9188 | 1 Schneider Electric | 1 Proclima | 2025-07-24 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in an ActiveX control in MDraw30.ocx in Schneider Electric ProClima before 6.1.7 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-8513 and CVE-2014-8514. NOTE: this may be clarified later based on details provided by researchers. | |||||
| CVE-2025-3848 | 2025-07-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2025-25171. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2025-25171. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2025-25171 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2010-0425 | 5 Apache, Broadcom, Ibm and 2 more | 6 Http Server, Vmware Ace Management Server, Http Server and 3 more | 2025-07-24 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| modules/arch/win32/mod_isapi.c in mod_isapi in the Apache HTTP Server 2.0.37 through 2.0.63, 2.2.0 through 2.2.14, and 2.3.x before 2.3.7, when running on Windows, does not ensure that request processing is complete before calling isapi_unload for an ISAPI .dll module, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors related to a crafted request, a reset packet, and "orphaned callback pointers." | |||||
| CVE-2025-34092 | 2025-07-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Neither filed by Chrome nor a valid security vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2025-34091 | 2025-07-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Neither filed by Chrome nor a valid security vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2025-34090 | 2025-07-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Neither filed by Chrome nor a valid security vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2025-22115 | 2025-07-24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix block group refcount race in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() Block group creation is done in two phases, which results in a slightly unintuitive property: a block group can be allocated/deallocated from after btrfs_make_block_group() adds it to the space_info with btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info(), but before creation is completely completed in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(). As a result, it is possible for a block group to go unused and have 'btrfs_mark_bg_unused' called on it concurrently with 'btrfs_create_pending_block_groups'. This causes a number of issues, which were fixed with the block group flag 'BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEW'. However, this fix is not quite complete. Since it does not use the unused_bg_lock, it is possible for the following race to occur: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups btrfs_mark_bg_unused if list_empty // false list_del_init clear_bit else if (test_bit) // true list_move_tail And we get into the exact same broken ref count and invalid new_bgs state for transaction cleanup that BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEW was designed to prevent. The broken refcount aspect will result in a warning like: [1272.943527] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. [1272.943967] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 61 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.944731] Modules linked in: btrfs virtio_net xor zstd_compress raid6_pq null_blk [last unloaded: btrfs] [1272.945550] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 61 Comm: kworker/u32:1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.14.0-rc5+ #108 [1272.946368] Tainted: [W]=WARN [1272.946585] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014 [1272.947273] Workqueue: btrfs_discard btrfs_discard_workfn [btrfs] [1272.947788] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.949532] RSP: 0018:ffffbf1200247df0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [1272.949901] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa14b00e3f800 RCX: 0000000000000000 [1272.950437] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffbf1200247c78 RDI: 00000000ffffdfff [1272.950986] RBP: ffffa14b00dc2860 R08: 00000000ffffdfff R09: ffffffff90526268 [1272.951512] R10: ffffffff904762c0 R11: 0000000063666572 R12: ffffa14b00dc28c0 [1272.952024] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffa14b00dc2868 R15: 000001285dcd12c0 [1272.952850] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa14d33c40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1272.953458] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1272.953931] CR2: 00007f838cbda000 CR3: 000000010104e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [1272.954474] Call Trace: [1272.954655] <TASK> [1272.954812] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.955173] ? __warn.cold+0x93/0xd7 [1272.955487] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.955816] ? report_bug+0xe7/0x120 [1272.956103] ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90 [1272.956424] ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 [1272.956700] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [1272.957011] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.957399] btrfs_discard_cancel_work.cold+0x26/0x2b [btrfs] [1272.957853] btrfs_put_block_group.cold+0x5d/0x8e [btrfs] [1272.958289] btrfs_discard_workfn+0x194/0x380 [btrfs] [1272.958729] process_one_work+0x130/0x290 [1272.959026] worker_thread+0x2ea/0x420 [1272.959335] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [1272.959644] kthread+0xd7/0x1c0 [1272.959872] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [1272.960172] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [1272.960474] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [1272.960745] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [1272.961035] </TASK> [1272.961238] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Though we have seen them in the async discard workfn as well. It is most likely to happen after a relocation finishes which cancels discard, tears down the block group, etc. Fix this fully by taking the lock arou ---truncated--- | |||||
| CVE-2025-54371 | 2025-07-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: This CVE is a duplicate of another CVE. | |||||
| CVE-2025-41662 | 2025-07-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: CVE-2025-41662 is considered redundant or unnecessary and thus should be withdrawn. Instead, a new CVE CVE-2025-41687 has been reserved to better reflect the updated analysis. | |||||
| CVE-2025-53640 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Indico is an event management system that uses Flask-Multipass, a multi-backend authentication system for Flask. Starting in version 2.2 and prior to version 3.3.7, an endpoint used to display details of users listed in certain fields (such as ACLs) could be misused to dump basic user details (such as name, affiliation and email) in bulk. Version 3.3.7 fixes the issue. Owners of instances that allow everyone to create a user account, who wish to truly restrict access to these user details, should consider restricting user search to managers. As a workaround, it is possible to restrict access to the affected endpoints (e.g. in the webserver config), but doing so would break certain form fields which could no longer show the details of the users listed in those fields, so upgrading instead is highly recommended. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7783 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Use of Insufficiently Random Values vulnerability in form-data allows HTTP Parameter Pollution (HPP). This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/form_data.Js. This issue affects form-data: < 2.5.4, 3.0.0 - 3.0.3, 4.0.0 - 4.0.3. | |||||
| CVE-2025-53892 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Vue I18n is the internationalization plugin for Vue.js. The escapeParameterHtml: true option in Vue I18n is designed to protect against HTML/script injection by escaping interpolated parameters. However, starting in version 9.0.0 and prior to versions 9.14.5, 10.0.8, and 11.1.0, this setting fails to prevent execution of certain tag-based payloads, such as <img src=x onerror=...>, if the interpolated value is inserted inside an HTML context using v-html. This may lead to a DOM-based XSS vulnerability, even when using escapeParameterHtml: true, if a translation string includes minor HTML and is rendered via v-html. Versions 9.14.5, 10.0.8, and 11.1.0 contain a fix for the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-49604 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7397 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A vulnerability in the ascgshell, of Brocade ASCG before 3.3.0 stores any command executed in the Command Line Interface (CLI) in plain text within the command history. A local authenticated user that can access sensitive information like passwords within the CLI history leading to unauthorized access and potential data breaches. | |||||
| CVE-2025-53888 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| RIOT-OS, an operating system that supports Internet of Things devices, has an ineffective size check implemented with `assert()` can lead to buffer overflow in versions up to and including 2025.04. Assertions are usually compiled out in production builds. If assertions are the only defense against untrusted inputs, the software may be exposed to attacks that utilize the lack of proper input checks. In the `l2filter_add()` function shown below, `addr_len` is checked using an assertion and is subsequently used as an argument in a `memcpy()` call. When assertions are disabled, there would be no size check for `addr_len`. As a consequence, if an attacker were to provide an `addr_len` value larger than `CONFIG_L2FILTER_ADDR_MAXLEN`, they can trigger a buffer overflow and write past the `list[i].addr` buffer. If the unchecked input is attacker-controlled, the impact of the buffer overflow can range from a denial of service to arbitrary code execution. Commit f6f7de4ccc107c018630e4c15500825caf02e1c2 contains a patch for the vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2025-49485 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A SQL injection vulnerability in the Balbooa Forms plugin 1.0.0-2.3.1.1 for Joomla allows privileged users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the 'id' parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2025-50057 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A DOS vulnerability in RSFiles! component 1.16.3-1.17.7 Joomla was discovered. The issue allows unauthenticated remote attackers to deny access to service via the search feature. | |||||
| CVE-2025-50058 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A stored XSS vulnerability in the RSDirectory! component 1.0.0-2.2.8 Joomla was discovered. The issue allows remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the review reply component. | |||||