Total
937 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-10322 | 1 Synology | 1 Photo Station | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Synology Photo Station before 6.3-2958 allows remote authenticated guest users to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header to photo/login.php. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6048 | 1 Satel-iberia | 3 Sennet Multitask Meter, Sennet Optimal Datalogger, Sennet Solar Datalogger | 2025-04-20 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Command Injection issue was discovered in Satel Iberia SenNet Data Logger and Electricity Meters: SenNet Optimal DataLogger V5.37c-1.43c and prior, SenNet Solar Datalogger V5.03-1.56a and prior, and SenNet Multitask Meter V5.21a-1.18b and prior. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could result in the attacker breaking out of the jailed shell and gaining full access to the system. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9553 | 1 Sophos | 1 Web Appliance | 2025-04-20 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| The Sophos Web Appliance (version 4.2.1.3) is vulnerable to two Remote Command Injection vulnerabilities affecting its web administrative interface. These vulnerabilities occur in the MgrReport.php (/controllers/MgrReport.php) component responsible for blocking and unblocking IP addresses from accessing the device. The device doesn't properly escape the information passed in the variables 'unblockip' and 'blockip' before calling the shell_exec() function which allows for system commands to be injected into the device. The code erroneously suggests that the information handled is protected by utilizing the variable name 'escapedips' - however this was not the case. The Sophos ID is NSWA-1258. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8197 | 1 Huawei | 1 Fusionsphere | 2025-04-20 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| FusionSphere V100R006C00SPC102(NFV) has a command injection vulnerability. An authenticated, remote attacker could craft packets with malicious strings and send them to a target device. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to launch a command injection attack and execute system commands. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4922 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos | 2025-04-20 | 7.2 HIGH | 8.4 HIGH |
| Certain combinations of Junos OS CLI commands and arguments have been found to be exploitable in a way that can allow unauthorized access to the operating system. This may allow any user with permissions to run these CLI commands the ability to achieve elevated privileges and gain complete control of the device. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS 11.4 prior to 11.4R13-S3; 12.1X46 prior to 12.1X46-D60; 12.1X47 prior to 12.1X47-D45; 12.3 prior to 12.3R12; 12.3X48 prior to 12.3X48-D35; 13.2 prior to 13.2R9; 13.3 prior to 13.3R4-S11, 13.3R9; 14.1 prior to 14.1R4-S12, 14.1R7; 14.1X53 prior to 14.1X53-D28, 14.1X53-D40; 14.1X55 prior to 14.1X55-D35; 14.2 prior to 14.2R3-S10, 14.2R4-S7, 14.2R5; 15.1 prior to 15.1F4, 15.1R3; 15.1X49 prior to 15.1X49-D60; 15.1X53 prior to 15.1X53-D57, 15.1X53-D70. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6534 | 1 Opmantek | 1 Network Management Information System | 2025-04-20 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Opmantek NMIS before 4.3.7c has command injection via man, finger, ping, trace, and nslookup in the tools.pl CGI script. Versions before 8.5.12G might be affected in non-default configurations. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4054 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Advanced Threat Defense | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Command Injection vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Advanced Threat Defense (ATD) 3.10, 3.8, 3.6, 3.4 allows remote authenticated users to execute a command of their choice via a crafted HTTP request parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6270 | 1 Trendmicro | 1 Virtual Mobile Infrastructure | 2025-04-20 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The handle_certificate function in /vmi/manager/engine/management/commands/apns_worker.py in Trend Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure before 5.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the password to api/v1/cfg/oauth/save_identify_pfx/. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12756 | 1 Extplorer | 1 Extplorer | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| Command inject in transfer from another server in extplorer 2.1.9 and prior allows attacker to inject command via the userfile[0] parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2210 | 1 Epicor | 1 Crs Retail Store | 2025-04-20 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| The help window in Epicor CRS Retail Store before 3.2.03.01.008 allows local users to execute arbitrary code by injecting Javascript into the window source to create a button that spawns a command shell. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6183 | 1 Sophos | 1 Web Appliance | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Sophos Web Appliance (SWA) before 4.3.1.2, a section of the machine's configuration utilities for adding (and detecting) Active Directory servers was vulnerable to remote command injection, aka NSWA-1314. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11392 | 1 Trendmicro | 1 Interscan Messaging Security Virtual Appliance | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Proxy command injection vulnerability in Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Virtual Appliance 9.0 and 9.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations. The specific flaw can be exploited by parsing the "T" parameter within modTMCSS Proxy. Formerly ZDI-CAN-4745. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14081 | 1 Trendmicro | 1 Mobile Security | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Proxy command injection vulnerabilities in Trend Micro Mobile Security (Enterprise) versions before 9.7 Patch 3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4989 | 2 Redhat, Setroubleshoot Project | 5 Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Hpc Node, Enterprise Linux Server and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| setroubleshoot allows local users to bypass an intended container protection mechanism and execute arbitrary commands by (1) triggering an SELinux denial with a crafted file name, which is handled by the _set_tpath function in audit_data.py or via a crafted (2) local_id or (3) analysis_id field in a crafted XML document to the run_fix function in SetroubleshootFixit.py, related to the subprocess.check_output and commands.getstatusoutput functions, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4445. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8131 | 1 Huawei | 1 Fusionsphere Openstack | 2025-04-20 | 8.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The FusionSphere OpenStack with software V100R006C00 and V100R006C10 has a command injection vulnerability due to the insufficient input validation on four TCP listening ports. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit the vulnerabilities to gain root privileges by sending some messages with malicious commands. | |||||
| CVE-2015-6971 | 1 Lenovo | 1 System Update | 2025-04-20 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Lenovo System Update (formerly ThinkVantage System Update) before 5.07.0013 allows local users to submit commands to the System Update service (SUService.exe) and gain privileges by launching signed Lenovo executables. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4445 | 2 Redhat, Setroubleshoot Project | 5 Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Hpc Node, Enterprise Linux Server and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| The fix_lookup_id function in sealert in setroubleshoot before 3.2.23 allows local users to execute arbitrary commands as root by triggering an SELinux denial with a crafted file name, related to executing external commands with the commands.getstatusoutput function. | |||||
| CVE-2014-9114 | 3 Fedoraproject, Kernel, Opensuse | 3 Fedora, Util-linux, Opensuse | 2025-04-20 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Blkid in util-linux before 2.26rc-1 allows local users to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4929 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos Space | 2025-04-20 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Command injection vulnerability in Junos Space before 15.2R2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code as a root user. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6327 | 1 Symantec | 1 Message Gateway | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Symantec Messaging Gateway before 10.6.3-267 can encounter an issue of remote code execution, which describes a situation whereby an individual may obtain the ability to execute commands remotely on a target machine or in a target process. In this type of occurrence, after gaining access to the system, the attacker may attempt to elevate their privileges. | |||||