Filtered by vendor Microsoft
Subscribe
Total
18433 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2006-1651 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Isa Server | 2024-05-14 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| ** DISPUTED ** Microsoft ISA Server 2004 allows remote attackers to bypass certain filtering rules, including ones for (1) ICMP and (2) TCP, via IPv6 packets. NOTE: An established researcher has disputed this issue, saying that "Neither ISA Server 2004 nor Windows 2003 Basic Firewall support IPv6 filtering ... This is different network protocol." | |||||
| CVE-2005-3981 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server, Windows Xp | 2024-05-14 | 4.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| ** DISPUTED ** NOTE: this issue has been disputed by third parties. Microsoft Windows XP, 2000, and 2003 allows local users to kill a writable process by using the CreateRemoteThread function with certain arguments on a process that has been opened using the OpenProcess function, possibly involving an invalid address for the start routine. NOTE: followup posts have disputed this issue, saying that if a user already has privileges to write to a process, then other functions could be called or the process could be terminated using PROCESS_TERMINATE. | |||||
| CVE-2004-2339 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server, Windows Xp | 2024-05-14 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| ** DISPUTED ** Microsoft Windows 2000, XP, and possibly 2003 allows local users with the SeDebugPrivilege privilege to execute arbitrary code as kernel and read or write kernel memory via the NtSystemDebugControl function, which does not verify its pointer arguments. Note: this issue has been disputed, since Administrator privileges are typically required to exploit this issue, thus privilege boundaries are not crossed. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1533 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Isa Server | 2024-05-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| ** DISPUTED * Microsoft Internet Security and Acceleration (ISA) Server 2000 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a flood of fragmented UDP packets. NOTE: the vendor disputes this issue, saying that it requires high bandwidth to exploit, and the server does not experience any instability. Therefore this "laws of physics" issue might not be included in CVE. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1519 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows 2000 | 2024-05-14 | 3.6 LOW | N/A |
| ** DISPUTED ** RunAs (runas.exe) in Windows 2000 allows local users to create a spoofed named pipe when the service is stopped, then capture cleartext usernames and passwords when clients connect to the service. NOTE: the vendor disputes this issue, saying that administrative privileges are already required to exploit it. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1517 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows 2000 | 2024-05-14 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| ** DISPUTED ** RunAs (runas.exe) in Windows 2000 stores cleartext authentication information in memory, which could allow attackers to obtain usernames and passwords by executing a process that is allocated the same memory page after termination of a RunAs command. NOTE: the vendor disputes this issue, saying that administrative privileges are already required to exploit it, and the original researcher did not respond to requests for additional information. | |||||
| CVE-2024-29988 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 4 more | 2024-05-03 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| SmartScreen Prompt Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2023-48795 | 43 9bis, Apache, Apple and 40 more | 69 Kitty, Sshd, Sshj and 66 more | 2024-05-01 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust. | |||||
| CVE-2024-29052 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2, Windows 11 21h2 and 4 more | 2024-04-26 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Windows Storage Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-29054 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Defender For Iot | 2024-04-26 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-29053 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Defender For Iot | 2024-04-26 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-29055 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Defender For Iot | 2024-04-26 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-29056 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 and 3 more | 2024-04-26 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Windows Authentication Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-29061 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2024-04-26 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-29062 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2024-04-26 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2023-44487 | 31 Akka, Amazon, Apache and 28 more | 127 Http Server, Opensearch Data Prepper, Apisix and 124 more | 2024-04-26 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38028 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7 and 7 more | 2024-04-24 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2022-38710 | 2 Ibm, Microsoft | 4 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 1 more | 2024-04-18 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.1 and 21.0.2 could disclose sensitive version information that could aid in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 234292. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26419 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2024-04-16 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2020-1567 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2024-04-16 | 7.6 HIGH | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the MSHTML engine improperly validates input. An attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. In a HTML editing attack scenario, an attacker could trick a user into editing a specially crafted file that is designed to exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how MSHTML engine validates input. | |||||