Total
259 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-31457 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13147. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31456 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13102. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31461 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the the handling of app.media objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process Was ZDI-CAN-13333. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31473 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.3.37598. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the browseForDoc function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13523. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31458 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13150. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31460 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of XFA templates. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13096. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31459 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA Forms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13162. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20315 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20310 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyDoAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20316 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyDoAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read, a different issue than CVE-2018-20310 because of a different opcode. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20313 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyPreviewAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20309 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyGetAppEdition race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20312 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyDoAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read, a different issue than CVE-2018-20310 because of a different opcode. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20314 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyCheckLicence race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20311 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyCPDFAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20836 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.5. It has mishandling of cloud credentials, as demonstrated by Google Drive. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10906 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the resetForm method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10614. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15638 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.2.29539. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the NodeProperties::InferReceiverMapsUnsafe method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10950. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13815 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.1. It allows stack consumption via a loop of an indirect object reference. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10901 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10461. | |||||