Total
14 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2008-0960 | 6 Cisco, Ecos Sourceware, Ingate and 3 more | 25 Ace 10 6504 Bundle With 4 Gbps Throughput, Ace 10 6509 Bundle With 8 Gbps Throughput, Ace 10 Service Module and 22 more | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| SNMPv3 HMAC verification in (1) Net-SNMP 5.2.x before 5.2.4.1, 5.3.x before 5.3.2.1, and 5.4.x before 5.4.1.1; (2) UCD-SNMP; (3) eCos; (4) Juniper Session and Resource Control (SRC) C-series 1.0.0 through 2.0.0; (5) NetApp (aka Network Appliance) Data ONTAP 7.3RC1 and 7.3RC2; (6) SNMP Research before 16.2; (7) multiple Cisco IOS, CatOS, ACE, and Nexus products; (8) Ingate Firewall 3.1.0 and later and SIParator 3.1.0 and later; (9) HP OpenView SNMP Emanate Master Agent 15.x; and possibly other products relies on the client to specify the HMAC length, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass SNMP authentication via a length value of 1, which only checks the first byte. | |||||
| CVE-2008-0263 | 1 Ingate | 2 Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The SIP module in Ingate Firewall before 4.6.1 and SIParator before 4.6.1 does not reuse SIP media ports in unspecified call hold and send-only stream scenarios, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (port exhaustion) via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2007-6099 | 1 Ingate | 2 Ingate Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Ingate Firewall before 4.6.0 and SIParator before 4.6.0 might leave "media pinholes" open upon a restart of the SIP module, which might make it easier for remote attackers to conduct unauthorized activities. | |||||
| CVE-2007-6098 | 1 Ingate | 2 Ingate Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Ingate Firewall before 4.6.0 and SIParator before 4.6.0 do not log truncated (1) ICMP, (2) UDP, and (3) TCP packets, which has unknown impact and remote attack vectors; and do not log (4) serial-console login attempts with nonexistent usernames, which might make it easier for attackers with physical access to guess valid login credentials while avoiding detection. | |||||
| CVE-2007-6097 | 1 Ingate | 2 Ingate Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the ICMP implementation in Ingate Firewall before 4.6.0 and SIParator before 4.6.0 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, related to ICMP packets that are "incorrectly accepted." | |||||
| CVE-2007-6096 | 1 Ingate | 2 Ingate Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Ingate Firewall before 4.6.0 and SIParator before 4.6.0 use cleartext storage for passwords of "administrators with less privileges," which might allow attackers to read these passwords via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2007-6095 | 1 Ingate | 2 Ingate Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The SIP component in Ingate Firewall before 4.6.0 and SIParator before 4.6.0, when Remote NAT Traversal is employed, does not properly perform user registration and message distribution, which might allow remote authenticated users to receive messages intended for other users. | |||||
| CVE-2007-6094 | 1 Ingate | 2 Ingate Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The IPsec module in the VPN component in Ingate Firewall before 4.6.0 and SIParator before 4.6.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (module crash) via an IPsec Phase 2 proposal that lacks Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS). | |||||
| CVE-2007-6093 | 1 Ingate | 2 Ingate Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 HIGH | N/A |
| The SRTP implementation in Ingate Firewall before 4.6.0 and SIParator before 4.6.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (kernel crash) via an RTCP index that is "much more than expected." | |||||
| CVE-2007-6092 | 1 Ingate | 2 Ingate Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in libsrtp in Ingate Firewall before 4.6.0 and SIParator before 4.6.0 has unknown impact and attack vectors. NOTE: it is not clear whether this issue crosses privilege boundaries. | |||||
| CVE-2007-3177 | 1 Ingate | 2 Ingate Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Ingate Firewall and SIParator before 4.5.2 allow remote attackers to bypass SIP authentication via a certain maddr parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2007-3176 | 1 Ingate | 2 Ingate Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Ingate Firewall and SIParator before 4.5.2 allows remote authenticated users without full privileges to download a Support Report. | |||||
| CVE-2006-2924 | 1 Ingate | 2 Ingate Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Ingate Firewall in the SIP module before 4.4.1 and SIParator before 4.4.1, when TLS is enabled or when SSL/TLS is enabled in the web server, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake. | |||||
| CVE-2003-1112 | 1 Ingate | 2 Ingate Firewall, Ingate Siparator | 2024-11-20 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation in Ingate Firewall and Ingate SIParator before 3.1.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted INVITE messages, as demonstrated by the OUSPG PROTOS c07-sip test suite. | |||||