Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Filtered by vendor Foxitsoftware Subscribe
Filtered by product Foxit Reader
Total 371 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2018-18689 14 Apple, Avanquest, Foxitsoftware and 11 more 20 Macos, Expert Pdf Ultimate, Pdf Experte Ultimate and 17 more 2024-11-27 5.0 MEDIUM 5.3 MEDIUM
The Portable Document Format (PDF) specification does not provide any information regarding the concrete procedure of how to validate signatures. Consequently, a Signature Wrapping vulnerability exists in multiple products. An attacker can use /ByteRange and xref manipulations that are not detected by the signature-validation logic. This affects Foxit Reader before 9.4 and PhantomPDF before 8.3.9 and 9.x before 9.4. It also affects eXpert PDF 12 Ultimate, Expert PDF Reader, Nitro Pro, Nitro Reader, PDF Architect 6, PDF Editor 6 Pro, PDF Experte 9 Ultimate, PDFelement6 Pro, PDF Studio Viewer 2018, PDF Studio Pro, PDF-XChange Editor and Viewer, Perfect PDF 10 Premium, Perfect PDF Reader, Soda PDF, and Soda PDF Desktop.
CVE-2023-41257 1 Foxitsoftware 1 Foxit Reader 2024-11-21 N/A 8.8 HIGH
A type confusion vulnerability exists in the way Foxit Reader 12.1.2.15356 handles field value properties. A specially crafted Javascript code inside a malicious PDF document can trigger this vulnerability, which can lead to memory corruption and result in arbitrary code execution. An attacker needs to trick the user into opening the malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. Exploitation is also possible if a user visits a specially crafted, malicious site if the browser plugin extension is enabled.
CVE-2023-40194 1 Foxitsoftware 1 Foxit Reader 2024-11-21 N/A 8.8 HIGH
An arbitrary file creation vulnerability exists in the Javascript exportDataObject API of Foxit Reader 12.1.3.15356 due to mistreatment of whitespace characters. A specially crafted malicious file can create files at arbitrary locations, which can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker needs to trick the user into opening the malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. Exploitation is also possible if a user visits a specially crafted, malicious site if the browser plugin extension is enabled.
CVE-2023-39542 1 Foxitsoftware 1 Foxit Reader 2024-11-21 N/A 8.8 HIGH
A code execution vulnerability exists in the Javascript saveAs API of Foxit Reader 12.1.3.15356. A specially crafted malformed file can create arbitrary files, which can lead to remote code execution. An attacker needs to trick the user into opening the malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. Exploitation is also possible if a user visits a specially crafted, malicious site if the browser plugin extension is enabled.
CVE-2023-38573 1 Foxitsoftware 1 Foxit Reader 2024-11-21 N/A 8.8 HIGH
A use-after-free vulnerability exists in the way Foxit Reader 12.1.2.15356 handles a signature field. A specially crafted Javascript code inside a malicious PDF document can trigger reuse of a previously freed object, which can lead to memory corruption and result in arbitrary code execution. An attacker needs to trick the user into opening the malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. Exploitation is also possible if a user visits a specially crafted, malicious site if the browser plugin extension is enabled.
CVE-2023-35985 1 Foxitsoftware 1 Foxit Reader 2024-11-21 N/A 8.8 HIGH
An arbitrary file creation vulnerability exists in the Javascript exportDataObject API of Foxit Reader 12.1.3.15356 due to a failure to properly validate a dangerous extension. A specially crafted malicious file can create files at arbitrary locations, which can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker needs to trick the user into opening the malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. Exploitation is also possible if a user visits a specially-crafted malicious site if the browser plugin extension is enabled.
CVE-2023-32616 1 Foxitsoftware 1 Foxit Reader 2024-11-21 N/A 8.8 HIGH
A use-after-free vulnerability exists in the way Foxit Reader 12.1.2.15356 handles 3D annotations. A specially crafted Javascript code inside a malicious PDF document can trigger reuse of a previously freed object, which can lead to memory corruption and result in arbitrary code execution. An attacker needs to trick the user into opening the malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. Exploitation is also possible if a user visits a specially crafted, malicious site if the browser plugin extension is enabled.
CVE-2021-38574 1 Foxitsoftware 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf 2024-11-21 7.5 HIGH 9.8 CRITICAL
An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows SQL Injection via crafted data at the end of a string.
CVE-2021-38573 1 Foxitsoftware 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf 2024-11-21 7.5 HIGH 9.8 CRITICAL
An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows writing to arbitrary files because a CombineFiles pathname is not validated.
CVE-2021-38572 1 Foxitsoftware 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf 2024-11-21 7.5 HIGH 9.8 CRITICAL
An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows writing to arbitrary files because the extractPages pathname is not validated.
CVE-2021-38571 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows 2024-11-21 4.4 MEDIUM 7.8 HIGH
An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows DLL hijacking, aka CNVD-C-2021-68000 and CNVD-C-2021-68502.
CVE-2021-38570 1 Foxitsoftware 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf 2024-11-21 6.4 MEDIUM 9.1 CRITICAL
An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows attackers to delete arbitrary files (during uninstallation) via a symlink.
CVE-2021-38569 1 Foxitsoftware 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf 2024-11-21 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows stack consumption via recursive function calls during the handling of XFA forms or link objects.
CVE-2021-38568 1 Foxitsoftware 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf 2024-11-21 7.5 HIGH 9.8 CRITICAL
An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows memory corruption during conversion of a PDF document to a different document format.
CVE-2021-33795 1 Foxitsoftware 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf 2024-11-21 4.3 MEDIUM 5.5 MEDIUM
Foxit Reader before 10.1.4 and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4 produce incorrect PDF document signatures because the certificate name, document owner, and signature author are mishandled.
CVE-2021-33794 1 Foxitsoftware 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf 2024-11-21 6.4 MEDIUM 9.1 CRITICAL
Foxit Reader before 10.1.4 and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4 allow information disclosure or an application crash after mishandling the Tab key during XFA form interaction.
CVE-2021-33793 1 Foxitsoftware 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf 2024-11-21 7.5 HIGH 9.8 CRITICAL
Foxit Reader before 10.1.4 and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4 have an out-of-bounds write because the Cross-Reference table is mishandled during Office document conversion.
CVE-2021-33792 1 Foxitsoftware 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf 2024-11-21 6.8 MEDIUM 7.8 HIGH
Foxit Reader before 10.1.4 and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4 have an out-of-bounds write via a crafted /Size key in the Trailer dictionary.
CVE-2021-31476 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows 2024-11-21 6.8 MEDIUM 7.8 HIGH
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.3.37598. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA templates. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13531.
CVE-2021-31455 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows 2024-11-21 6.8 MEDIUM 7.8 HIGH
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA forms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13100.