Total
154 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2017-10759 | 2 Microsoft, Xnview | 2 Windows, Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
XnView Classic for Windows Version 2.40 might allow attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted .rle file, related to "Data from Faulting Address controls Branch Selection starting at ntdll_77df0000!LdrpInsertDependencyRecord+0x0000000000000039." | |||||
CVE-2013-3938 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
Integer overflow in xnview.exe in XnView 2.13 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large NUM_ELEMENTS field in an IFD_ENTRY structure in a JXR file, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. | |||||
CVE-2012-4988 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
Heap-based buffer overflow in the xjpegls.dll (aka JLS, JPEG-LS, or JPEG lossless) format plugin in XnView 1.99 and 1.99.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted JLS image file. | |||||
CVE-2012-0277 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
Heap-based buffer overflow in XnView before 1.99 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PCT image. | |||||
CVE-2012-0276 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in XnView before 1.99 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a (1) SGI32LogLum compressed TIFF image or (2) SGI32LogLum compressed TIFF image with the PhotometricInterpretation encoding set to LogL. | |||||
CVE-2012-0684 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
Integer overflow in XnViewer (aka XnView) before 1.98.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file containing PSD record types, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-0685. | |||||
CVE-2012-0685 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
Integer overflow in XnViewer (aka XnView) before 1.98.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file containing PSD record types, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-0684. | |||||
CVE-2012-0282 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
Heap-based buffer overflow in XnView before 1.99 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted ImageLeftPosition value in an ImageDescriptor structure in a GIF image. | |||||
CVE-2013-2577 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
Buffer overflow in XnView before 2.04 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PCT file. | |||||
CVE-2011-1338 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 6.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
Untrusted search path vulnerability in XnView before 1.98.1 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse .exe file in a folder selected by the "Open containing folder" menu item. | |||||
CVE-2012-1051 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
Heap-based buffer overflow in Xjp2.dll in the JPEG2000 plug-in in XnView 1.98.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a JPEG2000 (JP2) file with a crafted Quantization Default (QCD) marker segment. | |||||
CVE-2010-1932 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
Heap-based buffer overflow in XnView 1.97.4 and possibly earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a MultiBitMap (MBM) file with a Paint Data Section that contains a malformed Encoding field. | |||||
CVE-2009-4001 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
Integer overflow in XnView before 1.97.2 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a DICOM image with crafted dimensions, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow. | |||||
CVE-2008-1461 | 1 Xnview | 1 Xnview | 2024-02-04 | 7.6 HIGH | N/A |
Buffer overflow in XnView 1.92.1 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename argument on the command line. NOTE: it is unclear whether there are common handler configurations in which this argument is controlled by an attacker. |