Total
147 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-2638 | 3 Netapp, Oracle, Redhat | 24 Active Iq Unified Manager, Cloud Backup, E-series Santricity Management Plug-ins and 21 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 8.3 HIGH |
| Vulnerability in the Java SE component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Deployment). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 8u152 and 9.0.1. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Java SE, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Java SE. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.0 Base Score 8.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). | |||||
| CVE-2018-2581 | 3 Netapp, Oracle, Redhat | 20 Active Iq Unified Manager, Cloud Backup, E-series Santricity Management Plug-ins and 17 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability in the Java SE component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: JavaFX). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 7u161, 8u152 and 9.0.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Java SE, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Java SE accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.0 Base Score 4.7 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N). | |||||
| CVE-2018-12538 | 2 Eclipse, Netapp | 12 Jetty, E-series Santricity Management Plug-ins, E-series Santricity Os Controller and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 through 9.4.8, when using the optional Jetty provided FileSessionDataStore for persistent storage of HttpSession details, it is possible for a malicious user to access/hijack other HttpSessions and even delete unmatched HttpSessions present in the FileSystem's storage for the FileSessionDataStore. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11212 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Ijg and 4 more | 13 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Libjpeg and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in libjpeg 9a and 9d. The alloc_sarray function in jmemmgr.c allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero error) via a crafted file. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000632 | 5 Debian, Dom4j Project, Netapp and 2 more | 15 Debian Linux, Dom4j, Oncommand Workflow Automation and 12 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| dom4j version prior to version 2.1.1 contains a CWE-91: XML Injection vulnerability in Class: Element. Methods: addElement, addAttribute that can result in an attacker tampering with XML documents through XML injection. This attack appear to be exploitable via an attacker specifying attributes or elements in the XML document. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 2.1.1 or later. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7658 | 5 Debian, Eclipse, Hp and 2 more | 20 Debian Linux, Jetty, Xp P9000 and 17 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7657 | 5 Debian, Eclipse, Hp and 2 more | 18 Debian Linux, Jetty, Xp P9000 and 15 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request. | |||||