Total
549 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-21244 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Phantompdf | 2024-02-04 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.6. It allows arbitrary application execution via an embedded executable file in a PDF portfolio, aka FG-VD-18-029. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13810 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.2. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10905 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of vertices in U3D objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10568. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13804 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.2. It allows information disclosure of a hardcoded username and password in the DocuSign plugin. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20823 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Phantompdf | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.11. It has a buffer overflow because a looping correction does not occur after JavaScript updates Field APs. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10899 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of XFA templates. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10132. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10908 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Export command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9865. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20814 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Phantompdf | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.12. It allows memory consumption because data is created for each page of an application level. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10896 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10192. | |||||
| CVE-2018-21238 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Phantompdf | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.7. It allows memory consumption via an ArrayBuffer(0xfffffffe) call. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10890 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the communication API. The issue lies in the handling of the ConvertToPDF command, which allows an arbitrary file write with attacker controlled data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9829. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10909 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the AddWatermark command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9942. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10893 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in a PDF. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10189. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10895 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10191. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20824 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Phantompdf | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.11. It has a NULL pointer dereference via FXSYS_wcslen in an Epub file. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10910 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the RotatePage command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9943. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10907 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.7.1.29511. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of widgets in XFA forms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-10650. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12248 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.0.1, and PhantomPDF before 9.7.3, attackers can execute arbitrary code via a heap-based buffer overflow because dirty image-resource data is mishandled. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10891 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Save command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9831. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20826 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF Mac 3.3 and Foxit Reader for Mac before 3.3. It has a NULL pointer dereference. | |||||