Total
219 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2010-2227 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.29, 6.0.0 through 6.0.27, and 7.0.0 beta does not properly handle an invalid Transfer-Encoding header, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application outage) or obtain sensitive information via a crafted header that interferes with "recycling of a buffer." | |||||
CVE-2011-3376 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
org/apache/catalina/core/DefaultInstanceManager.java in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.22 does not properly restrict ContainerServlets in the Manager application, which allows local users to gain privileges by using an untrusted web application to access the Manager application's functionality. | |||||
CVE-2010-3718 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 1.2 LOW | N/A |
Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 6.0.x, and 5.5.x, when running within a SecurityManager, does not make the ServletContext attribute read-only, which allows local web applications to read or write files outside of the intended working directory, as demonstrated using a directory traversal attack. | |||||
CVE-2011-1183 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
Apache Tomcat 7.0.11, when web.xml has no login configuration, does not follow security constraints, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via HTTP requests to a meta-data complete web application. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2011-1088 and CVE-2011-1419. | |||||
CVE-2009-2901 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
The autodeployment process in Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.28 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.20, when autoDeploy is enabled, deploys appBase files that remain from a failed undeploy, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended authentication requirements via HTTP requests. | |||||
CVE-2012-4534 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 2.6 LOW | N/A |
org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.36 and 7.x before 7.0.28, when the NIO connector is used in conjunction with sendfile and HTTPS, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) by terminating the connection during the reading of a response. | |||||
CVE-2013-2185 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Tomcat, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform | 2025-04-11 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
** DISPUTED ** The readObject method in the DiskFileItem class in Apache Tomcat and JBoss Web, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.0 and Red Hat JBoss Portal 6.0.0, allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a NULL byte in a file name in a serialized instance, a similar issue to CVE-2013-2186. NOTE: this issue is reportedly disputed by the Apache Tomcat team, although Red Hat considers it a vulnerability. The dispute appears to regard whether it is the responsibility of applications to avoid providing untrusted data to be deserialized, or whether this class should inherently protect against this issue. | |||||
CVE-2011-2526 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.19, when sendfile is enabled for the HTTP APR or HTTP NIO connector, does not validate certain request attributes, which allows local users to bypass intended file access restrictions or cause a denial of service (infinite loop or JVM crash) by leveraging an untrusted web application. | |||||
CVE-2012-5568 | 2 Apache, Opensuse | 2 Tomcat, Opensuse | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
Apache Tomcat through 7.0.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via partial HTTP requests, as demonstrated by Slowloris. | |||||
CVE-2011-1419 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.11, when web.xml has no security constraints, does not follow ServletSecurity annotations, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via HTTP requests to a web application. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-1088. | |||||
CVE-2011-5063 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not check realm values, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging the availability of a protection space with weaker authentication or authorization requirements, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | |||||
CVE-2012-4431 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
org/apache/catalina/filters/CsrfPreventionFilter.java in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.36 and 7.x before 7.0.32 allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection mechanism via a request that lacks a session identifier. | |||||
CVE-2013-6357 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
** DISPUTED ** Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Manager application in Apache Tomcat 5.5.25 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that manipulate application deployment via the POST method, as demonstrated by a /manager/html/undeploy?path= URI. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this report, stating that "the Apache Tomcat Security team has not accepted any reports of CSRF attacks against the Manager application ... as they require a reckless system administrator." | |||||
CVE-2012-3546 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
org/apache/catalina/realm/RealmBase.java in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.36 and 7.x before 7.0.30, when FORM authentication is used, allows remote attackers to bypass security-constraint checks by leveraging a previous setUserPrincipal call and then placing /j_security_check at the end of a URI. | |||||
CVE-2010-4312 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
The default configuration of Apache Tomcat 6.x does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hijack a session via script access to a cookie. | |||||
CVE-2012-3544 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.37 and 7.x before 7.0.30 does not properly handle chunk extensions in chunked transfer coding, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by streaming data. | |||||
CVE-2011-2204 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 1.9 LOW | N/A |
Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.17, when the MemoryUserDatabase is used, creates log entries containing passwords upon encountering errors in JMX user creation, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a log file. | |||||
CVE-2010-1157 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 2.6 LOW | N/A |
Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.29 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.26 might allow remote attackers to discover the server's hostname or IP address by sending a request for a resource that requires (1) BASIC or (2) DIGEST authentication, and then reading the realm field in the WWW-Authenticate header in the reply. | |||||
CVE-2013-4590 | 3 Apache, Debian, Oracle | 3 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Solaris | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
Apache Tomcat before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.50, and 8.x before 8.0.0-RC10 allows attackers to obtain "Tomcat internals" information by leveraging the presence of an untrusted web application with a context.xml, web.xml, *.jspx, *.tagx, or *.tld XML document containing an external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. | |||||
CVE-2013-4286 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
Apache Tomcat before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.47, and 8.x before 8.0.0-RC3, when an HTTP connector or AJP connector is used, does not properly handle certain inconsistent HTTP request headers, which allows remote attackers to trigger incorrect identification of a request's length and conduct request-smuggling attacks via (1) multiple Content-Length headers or (2) a Content-Length header and a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" header. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2005-2090. |