Filtered by vendor Sonicwall
Subscribe
Total
190 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-22281 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Netextender | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in the SonicWall SSL-VPN NetExtender Windows Client (32 and 64 bit) in 10.2.322 and earlier versions, allows an attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code in the host windows operating system. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22280 | 1 Sonicwall | 2 Analytics, Global Management System | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command leading to Unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability, impacting SonicWall GMS 9.3.1-SP2-Hotfix1, Analytics On-Prem 2.5.0.3-2520 and earlier versions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22279 | 1 Sonicwall | 10 Sma 210, Sma 210 Firmware, Sma 410 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A post-authentication arbitrary file read vulnerability impacting end-of-life Secure Remote Access (SRA) products and older firmware versions of Secure Mobile Access (SMA) 100 series products, specifically the SRA appliances running all 8.x, 9.0.0.5-19sv and earlier versions and Secure Mobile Access (SMA) 100 series products running older firmware 9.0.0.9-26sv and earlier versions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22278 | 1 Sonicwall | 98 Nsa 2650, Nsa 2650 Firmware, Nsa 2700 and 95 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in SonicOS CFS (Content filtering service) returns a large 403 forbidden HTTP response message to the source address when users try to access prohibited resource this allows an attacker to cause HTTP Denial of Service (DoS) attack | |||||
| CVE-2022-22277 | 1 Sonicwall | 98 Nsa 2650, Nsa 2650 Firmware, Nsa 2700 and 95 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in SonicOS SNMP service resulting exposure of Wireless Access Point sensitive information in cleartext. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22276 | 1 Sonicwall | 98 Nsa 2650, Nsa 2650 Firmware, Nsa 2700 and 95 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in SonicOS SNMP service resulting exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized user. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22275 | 1 Sonicwall | 53 Nsa 2650, Nsa 2700, Nsa 3650 and 50 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Improper Restriction of TCP Communication Channel in HTTP/S inbound traffic from WAN to DMZ bypassing security policy until TCP handshake potentially resulting in Denial of Service (DoS) attack if a target host is vulnerable. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22274 | 1 Sonicwall | 33 Nsa 2700, Nsa 3700, Nsa 4700 and 30 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the SonicOS via HTTP request allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause Denial of Service (DoS) or potentially results in code execution in the firewall. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22273 | 1 Sonicwall | 18 Sma 200, Sma 200 Firmware, Sma 210 and 15 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Improper neutralization of Special Elements leading to OS Command Injection vulnerability impacting end-of-life Secure Remote Access (SRA) products and older firmware versions of Secure Mobile Access (SMA) 100 series products, specifically the SRA appliances running all 8.x, 9.0.0.5-19sv and earlier versions and Secure Mobile Access (SMA) 100 series products running older firmware 9.0.0.9-26sv and earlier versions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1703 | 1 Sonicwall | 6 Sma 210, Sma 210 Firmware, Sma 410 and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Improper neutralization of special elements in the SonicWall SSL-VPN SMA100 series management interface allows a remote authenticated attacker to inject OS Commands which potentially leads to remote command execution vulnerability or denial of service (DoS) attack. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1702 | 1 Sonicwall | 10 Sma 6200, Sma 6200 Firmware, Sma 6210 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| SonicWall SMA1000 series firmware 12.4.0, 12.4.1-02965 and earlier versions accept a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site and uses that link in a redirect which leads to Open redirection vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1701 | 1 Sonicwall | 10 Sma 6200, Sma 6200 Firmware, Sma 6210 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| SonicWall SMA1000 series firmware 12.4.0, 12.4.1-02965 and earlier versions uses a shared and hard-coded encryption key to store data. | |||||
| CVE-2021-45105 | 5 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 2 more | 44 Log4j, Debian Linux, Cloud Manager and 41 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3450 | 10 Fedoraproject, Freebsd, Mcafee and 7 more | 35 Fedora, Freebsd, Web Gateway and 32 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j). | |||||
| CVE-2021-3449 | 11 Checkpoint, Debian, Fedoraproject and 8 more | 163 Multi-domain Management, Multi-domain Management Firmware, Quantum Security Gateway and 160 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j). | |||||
| CVE-2021-33909 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Linux and 3 more | 8 Debian Linux, Fedora, Linux Kernel and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| fs/seq_file.c in the Linux kernel 3.16 through 5.13.x before 5.13.4 does not properly restrict seq buffer allocations, leading to an integer overflow, an Out-of-bounds Write, and escalation to root by an unprivileged user, aka CID-8cae8cd89f05. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20051 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Global Vpn Client | 2024-11-21 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| SonicWall Global VPN Client 4.10.7.1117 installer (32-bit and 64-bit) and earlier versions have a DLL Search Order Hijacking vulnerability in one of the installer components. Successful exploitation via a local attacker could result in command execution in the target system. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20050 | 1 Sonicwall | 12 Sma100, Sma200, Sma210 and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An Improper Access Control Vulnerability in the SMA100 series leads to multiple restricted management APIs being accessible without a user login, potentially exposing configuration meta-data. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20049 | 1 Sonicwall | 12 Sma100, Sma200, Sma210 and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in SonicWall SMA100 password change API allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to perform SMA100 username enumeration based on the server responses. This vulnerability impacts 10.2.1.2-24sv, 10.2.0.8-37sv and earlier 10.x versions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20048 | 1 Sonicwall | 59 Nsa 2650, Nsa 2700, Nsa 3650 and 56 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Stack-based buffer overflow in the SonicOS SessionID HTTP response header allows a remote authenticated attacker to cause Denial of Service (DoS) and potentially results in code execution in the firewall. This vulnerability affected SonicOS Gen 5, Gen 6 and Gen 7 firmware versions. | |||||