Filtered by vendor Citrix
Subscribe
Total
414 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2022-34680 | 5 Citrix, Linux, Nvidia and 2 more | 12 Hypervisor, Linux Kernel, Cloud Gaming and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer handler, where an integer truncation can lead to an out-of-bounds read, which may lead to denial of service. | |||||
CVE-2022-34679 | 5 Citrix, Linux, Nvidia and 2 more | 6 Hypervisor, Linux Kernel, Cloud Gaming and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer handler, where an unhandled return value can lead to a null-pointer dereference, which may lead to denial of service. | |||||
CVE-2022-34678 | 6 Citrix, Linux, Microsoft and 3 more | 7 Hypervisor, Linux Kernel, Windows and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer, where an unprivileged user can cause a null-pointer dereference, which may lead to denial of service. | |||||
CVE-2022-34677 | 5 Citrix, Linux, Nvidia and 2 more | 12 Hypervisor, Linux Kernel, Cloud Gaming and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer handler, where an unprivileged regular user can cause an integer to be truncated, which may lead to denial of service or data tampering. | |||||
CVE-2022-34676 | 5 Citrix, Linux, Nvidia and 2 more | 6 Hypervisor, Linux Kernel, Cloud Gaming and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer handler, where an out-of-bounds read may lead to denial of service, information disclosure, or data tampering. | |||||
CVE-2022-34675 | 3 Citrix, Nvidia, Redhat | 9 Hypervisor, Cloud Gaming, Geforce and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
NVIDIA Display Driver for Linux contains a vulnerability in the Virtual GPU Manager, where it does not check the return value from a null-pointer dereference, which may lead to denial of service. | |||||
CVE-2022-34674 | 5 Citrix, Linux, Nvidia and 2 more | 12 Hypervisor, Linux Kernel, Cloud Gaming and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer handler, where a helper function maps more physical pages than were requested, which may lead to undefined behavior or an information leak. | |||||
CVE-2022-34670 | 5 Citrix, Linux, Nvidia and 2 more | 12 Hypervisor, Linux Kernel, Cloud Gaming and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer handler, where an unprivileged regular user can cause truncation errors when casting a primitive to a primitive of smaller size causes data to be lost in the conversion, which may lead to denial of service or information disclosure. | |||||
CVE-2022-34666 | 5 Citrix, Linux, Microsoft and 2 more | 6 Hypervisor, Linux Kernel, Windows and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer, where a local user with basic capabilities can cause a null-pointer dereference, which may lead to denial of service. | |||||
CVE-2022-27516 | 1 Citrix | 3 Application Delivery Controller, Application Delivery Controller Firmware, Gateway | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
User login brute force protection functionality bypass | |||||
CVE-2022-27513 | 1 Citrix | 3 Application Delivery Controller, Application Delivery Controller Firmware, Gateway | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH |
Remote desktop takeover via phishing | |||||
CVE-2022-27512 | 1 Citrix | 1 Application Delivery Management | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
Temporary disruption of the ADM license service. The impact of this includes preventing new licenses from being issued or renewed by Citrix ADM. | |||||
CVE-2022-27511 | 1 Citrix | 1 Application Delivery Management | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
Corruption of the system by a remote, unauthenticated user. The impact of this can include the reset of the administrator password at the next device reboot, allowing an attacker with ssh access to connect with the default administrator credentials after the device has rebooted. | |||||
CVE-2022-27510 | 1 Citrix | 3 Application Delivery Controller, Application Delivery Controller Firmware, Gateway | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
Unauthorized access to Gateway user capabilities | |||||
CVE-2022-27509 | 1 Citrix | 3 Application Delivery Controller, Application Delivery Controller Firmware, Gateway | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
Unauthenticated redirection to a malicious website | |||||
CVE-2022-27507 | 1 Citrix | 2 Application Delivery Controller, Gateway | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
Authenticated denial of service | |||||
CVE-2022-27506 | 1 Citrix | 26 Sd-wan 1000, Sd-wan 1000 Firmware, Sd-wan 110 and 23 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 2.7 LOW |
Hard-coded credentials allow administrators to access the shell via the SD-WAN CLI | |||||
CVE-2022-27505 | 1 Citrix | 24 Sd-wan 1000, Sd-wan 1000 Firmware, Sd-wan 110 and 21 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
Reflected cross site scripting (XSS) | |||||
CVE-2022-27503 | 1 Citrix | 1 Storefront Server | 2024-11-21 | 2.6 LOW | 6.1 MEDIUM |
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Citrix StoreFront affects version 1912 before CU5 and version 3.12 before CU9 | |||||
CVE-2022-26355 | 1 Citrix | 1 Federated Authentication Service | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
Citrix Federated Authentication Service (FAS) 7.17 - 10.6 causes deployments that have been configured to store a registration authority certificate's private key in a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) to incorrectly store that key in the Microsoft Software Key Storage Provider (MSKSP). This issue only occurs if PowerShell was used when configuring FAS to store the registration authority certificate’s private key in the TPM. It does not occur if the TPM was not selected for use or if the FAS administration console was used for configuration. |