Filtered by vendor Zimbra
Subscribe
Total
57 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-35209 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in ProxyServlet.java in the /proxy servlet in Zimbra Collaboration Suite 8.8 before 8.8.15 Patch 23 and 9.x before 9.0.0 Patch 16. The value of the X-Host header overwrites the value of the Host header in proxied requests. The value of X-Host header is not checked against the whitelist of hosts Zimbra is allowed to proxy to (the zimbraProxyAllowedDomains setting). | |||||
| CVE-2021-35208 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in ZmMailMsgView.js in the Calendar Invite component in Zimbra Collaboration Suite 8.8.x before 8.8.15 Patch 23. An attacker could place HTML containing executable JavaScript inside element attributes. This markup becomes unescaped, causing arbitrary markup to be injected into the document. | |||||
| CVE-2021-35207 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration Suite 8.8 before 8.8.15 Patch 23 and 9.0 before 9.0.0 Patch 16. An XSS vulnerability exists in the login component of Zimbra Web Client, in which an attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript by adding executable JavaScript to the loginErrorCode parameter of the login url. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34807 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An open redirect vulnerability exists in the /preauth Servlet in Zimbra Collaboration Suite through 9.0. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would need to have obtained a valid zimbra auth token or a valid preauth token. Once the token is obtained, an attacker could redirect a user to any URL via isredirect=1&redirectURL= in conjunction with the token data (e.g., a valid authtoken= value). | |||||
| CVE-2020-35123 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Zimbra Collaboration Suite Network Edition versions < 9.0.0 P10 and 8.8.15 P17, there exists an XXE vulnerability in the saml consumer store extension, which is vulnerable to XXE attacks. This has been fixed in Zimbra Collaboration Suite Network edition 9.0.0 Patch 10 and 8.8.15 Patch 17. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11737 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Zimbra | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Web Client in Zimbra 9.0 allows a remote attacker to craft links in an E-Mail message or calendar invite to execute arbitrary JavaScript. The attack requires an A element containing an href attribute with a "www" substring (including the quotes) followed immediately by a DOM event listener such as onmouseover. This is fixed in 9.0.0 Patch 2. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10194 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Zm-mailbox | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| cs/service/account/AutoCompleteGal.java in Zimbra zm-mailbox before 8.8.15.p8 allows authenticated users to request any GAL account. This differs from the intended behavior in which the domain of the authenticated user must match the domain of the galsync account in the request. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8947 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration Server | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Zimbra Collaboration 8.7.x - 8.8.11P2 contains non-persistent XSS. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8946 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration Server | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Zimbra Collaboration 8.7.x - 8.8.11P2 contains persistent XSS. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8945 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration Server | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Zimbra Collaboration 8.7.x - 8.8.11P2 contains persistent XSS. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15313 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration Server | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In Zimbra Collaboration before 8.8.15 Patch 1, there is a non-persistent XSS vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12427 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration Server | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| Zimbra Collaboration before 8.8.15 Patch 1 is vulnerable to a non-persistent XSS via the Admin Console. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10939 | 2 Synacor, Zimbra | 2 Zimbra Collaboration Suite, Zimbra Collaboration Suite | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Zimbra Web Client (ZWC) in Zimbra Collaboration Suite 8.8 before 8.8.8.Patch4 and 8.7 before 8.7.11.Patch4 has Persistent XSS via a contact group. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7610 | 2 Synacor, Zimbra | 2 Zimbra Collaboration Suite, Zimbra Collaboration Suite | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the login form in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (aka ZCS) before 8.6.0 Patch 10, 8.7.x before 8.7.11 Patch 2, and 8.8.x before 8.8.8 Patch 1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims by leveraging failure to use a CSRF token. | |||||
| CVE-2013-1938 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Zimbra | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Zimbra 2013 has XSS in aspell.php | |||||
| CVE-2024-45518 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-10-30 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.1.x before 10.1.1, 10.0.x before 10.0.9, 9.0.0 before Patch 41, and 8.8.15 before Patch 46. It allows authenticated users to exploit Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to improper input sanitization and misconfigured domain whitelisting. This issue permits unauthorized HTTP requests to be sent to internal services, which can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) by chaining Command Injection within the internal service. When combined with existing XSS vulnerabilities, this SSRF issue can further facilitate Remote Code Execution (RCE). | |||||
| CVE-2024-27442 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-08-13 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 9.0 and 10.0. The zmmailboxdmgr binary, a component of ZCS, is intended to be executed by the zimbra user with root privileges for specific mailbox operations. However, an attacker can escalate privileges from the zimbra user to root, because of improper handling of input arguments. An attacker can execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges, leading to local privilege escalation. | |||||