Filtered by vendor Stormshield
Subscribe
Total
53 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-31221 | 1 Stormshield | 1 Endpoint Security | 2024-02-04 | 2.9 LOW | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| SES Evolution before 2.1.0 allows deleting some parts of a security policy by leveraging access to a computer having the administration console installed. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31225 | 1 Stormshield | 1 Endpoint Security | 2024-02-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.3 HIGH |
| SES Evolution before 2.1.0 allows deleting some resources not currently in use by any security policy by leveraging access to a computer having the administration console installed. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31224 | 1 Stormshield | 1 Endpoint Security | 2024-02-04 | 2.9 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
| SES Evolution before 2.1.0 allows duplicating an existing security policy by leveraging access of a user having read-only access to security policies. | |||||
| CVE-2021-35957 | 1 Stormshield | 1 Endpoint Security | 2024-02-04 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Stormshield Endpoint Security Evolution 2.0.0 through 2.0.2 does not accomplish the intended defense against local administrators who can replace the Visual C++ runtime DLLs (in %WINDIR%\system32) with malicious ones. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7466 | 2 Mpd Project, Stormshield | 2 Mpd, Stormshield Network Security | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The PPP implementation of MPD before 5.9 allows a remote attacker who can send specifically crafted PPP authentication message to cause the daemon to read beyond allocated memory buffer, which would result in a denial of service condition. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7465 | 2 Mpd Project, Stormshield | 2 Mpd, Stormshield Network Security | 2024-02-04 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The L2TP implementation of MPD before 5.9 allows a remote attacker who can send specifically crafted L2TP control packet with AVP Q.931 Cause Code to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption). | |||||
| CVE-2020-8430 | 1 Stormshield | 1 Stormshield Network Security | 2024-02-04 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Stormshield Network Security 310 3.7.10 devices have an auth/lang.html?rurl= Open Redirect vulnerability on the captive portal. For example, the attacker can use rurl=//example.com instead of rurl=https://example.com in the query string. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20850 | 1 Stormshield | 1 Stormshield Network Security | 2024-02-04 | 7.2 HIGH | 8.2 HIGH |
| Stormshield Network Security 2.0.0 through 2.13.0 and 3.0.0 through 3.7.1 has self-XSS in the command line interface of the SNS web server. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0401 | 2 Openssl, Stormshield | 2 Openssl, Stormshield Management Center | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A NULL pointer can be dereferenced when signatures are being verified on PKCS7 signed or signedAndEnveloped data. In case the hash algorithm used for the signature is known to the OpenSSL library but the implementation of the hash algorithm is not available the digest initialization will fail. There is a missing check for the return value from the initialization function which later leads to invalid usage of the digest API most likely leading to a crash. The unavailability of an algorithm can be caused by using FIPS enabled configuration of providers or more commonly by not loading the legacy provider. PKCS7 data is processed by the SMIME library calls and also by the time stamp (TS) library calls. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call these functions however third party applications would be affected if they call these functions to verify signatures on untrusted data. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0286 | 2 Openssl, Stormshield | 3 Openssl, Stormshield Management Center, Stormshield Network Security | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial of service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which is uncommon. As such, this vulnerability is most likely to only affect applications which have implemented their own functionality for retrieving CRLs over a network. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0216 | 2 Openssl, Stormshield | 2 Openssl, Stormshield Management Center | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to load malformed PKCS7 data with the d2i_PKCS7(), d2i_PKCS7_bio() or d2i_PKCS7_fp() functions. The result of the dereference is an application crash which could lead to a denial of service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function however third party applications might call these functions on untrusted data. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4450 | 2 Openssl, Stormshield | 2 Openssl, Stormshield Network Security | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the "name" (e.g. "CERTIFICATE"), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the "name_out", "header" and "data" arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial of service attack. The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected. These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in OpenSSL 3.0. The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also impacted by this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4304 | 2 Openssl, Stormshield | 4 Openssl, Endpoint Security, Sslvpn and 1 more | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE. For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the application data sent over that connection. | |||||