Total
78 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-8204 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R5 on the PSAL Page. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35254 | 1 Ivanti | 3 Connect Secure, Neurons For Zero-trust Access, Policy Secure | 2024-02-27 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An unauthenticated attacker can cause a denial-of-service to the following products: Ivanti Connect Secure (ICS) in versions prior to 9.1R14.3, 9.1R15.2, 9.1R16.2, and 22.2R4, Ivanti Policy Secure (IPS) in versions prior to 9.1R17 and 22.3R1, and Ivanti Neurons for Zero-Trust Access in versions prior to 22.3R1. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20807 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An XSS issue has been found in welcome.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.1.x before 8.1R12, 8.2.x before 8.2R9, and 8.3.x before 8.3R3 due to one of the URL parameters not being sanitized properly. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22908 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Windows File Resource Profiles in 9.X allows a remote authenticated user with privileges to browse SMB shares to execute arbitrary code as the root user. As of version 9.1R3, this permission is not enabled by default. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15352 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 9.1R9 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 9.1R9 allows remote authenticated admins to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11508 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.1R15.1, 8.2 before 8.2R12.1, 8.3 before 8.3R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.4, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can exploit Directory Traversal to execute arbitrary code on the appliance. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20808 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An XSS issue has been found with rd.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 8.3RX before 8.3R3 due to improper header sanitization. This is not applicable to 8.1RX. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8256 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Pulse Connect Secure < 9.1R8.2 admin web interface could allow an authenticated attacker to gain arbitrary file reading access through Pulse Collaboration via XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22938 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure before 9.1R12 could allow an authenticated administrator to perform command injection via an unsanitized web parameter in the administrator web console. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11542 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-02-27 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can send a specially crafted message resulting in a stack buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8216 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in meeting of Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R8 allowed an authenticated end-users to find meeting details, if they know the Meeting ID. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8220 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R8 that allows an authenticated attacker to perform command injection via the administrator web which can cause DOS. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8261 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Pulse Connect Secure / Pulse Policy Secure < 9.1R9 is vulnerable to arbitrary cookie injection. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20813 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An input validation issue has been found with login_meeting.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 8.3RX before 8.3R2. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22937 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure before 9.1R12 could allow an authenticated administrator to perform a file write via a maliciously crafted archive uploaded in the administrator web interface. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6320 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-02-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability has been discovered in login.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.1RX before 8.1R12 and 8.3RX before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.2RX before 5.2R9 and 5.4RX before 5.4R2 wherein an http(s) Host header received from the browser is trusted without validation. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8222 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R8 that allowed an authenticated attacker via the administrator web interface to perform an arbitrary file reading vulnerability through Meeting. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11478 | 6 Canonical, F5, Ivanti and 3 more | 24 Ubuntu Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 21 more | 2024-02-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) sequences. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit f070ef2ac66716357066b683fb0baf55f8191a2e. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11477 | 6 Canonical, F5, Ivanti and 3 more | 24 Ubuntu Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 21 more | 2024-02-27 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs). A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit 3b4929f65b0d8249f19a50245cd88ed1a2f78cff. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22933 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure before 9.1R12 could allow an authenticated administrator to perform an arbitrary file delete via a maliciously crafted web request. | |||||