Filtered by vendor Pivotal Software
Subscribe
Total
145 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-4991 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v260; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.16, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.10, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.12, and other versions prior to v3.17.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.14, 24.x versions prior to v24.9, 30.x versions prior to 30.2, and other versions prior to v36. Privileged users in one zone are allowed to perform a password reset for users in a different zone. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4955 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal PCF Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.65, 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.48, 1.8.x versions prior to 1.8.28, and 1.9.x versions prior to 1.9.5. Several credentials were present in the logs for the Notifications errand in the PCF Elastic Runtime tile. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2165 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Loggregator Traffic Controller endpoints in cf-release v231 and lower, Pivotal Elastic Runtime versions prior to 1.5.19 AND 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.20 are not cleansing request URL paths when they are invalid and are returning them in the 404 response. This could allow malicious scripts to be written directly into the 404 response. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4959 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal PCF Elastic Runtime 1.8.x versions prior to 1.8.29 and 1.9.x versions prior to 1.9.7. Pivotal Cloud Foundry deployments using the Pivotal Account application are vulnerable to a flaw which allows an authorized user to take over the account of another user, causing account lockout and potential escalation of privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4468 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) before 238; UAA 2.x before 2.7.4.4, 3.x before 3.3.0.2, and 3.4.x before 3.4.1; UAA BOSH before 11.2 and 12.x before 12.2; Elastic Runtime before 1.6.29 and 1.7.x before 1.7.7; and Ops Manager 1.7.x before 1.7.8 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4973 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Cf, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v257; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.14, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.8, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.10, and other versions prior to v3.15.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.12, 24.x versions prior to v24.7, and other versions prior to v30. A vulnerability has been identified with the groups endpoint in UAA allowing users to elevate their privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2773 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal PCF Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.60, 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.41, 1.8.x versions prior to 1.8.23, and 1.9.x versions prior to 1.9.1. Incomplete validation logic in JSON Web Token (JWT) libraries can allow unprivileged attackers to impersonate other users in multiple components included in PCF Elastic Runtime, aka an "Unauthenticated JWT signing algorithm in multiple components" issue. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3190 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the UAA logout link is susceptible to an open redirect which allows an attacker to insert malicious web page as a redirect parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4972 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v257; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.14, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.8, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.10, and other versions prior to v3.15.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.12, 24.x versions prior to v24.7, and other versions prior to v30. An attacker can use a blind SQL injection attack to query the contents of the UAA database. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5016 | 1 Pivotal Software | 4 Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Pivotal Cloud Foundry 239 and earlier, UAA (aka User Account and Authentication Server) 3.4.1 and earlier, UAA release 12.2 and earlier, PCF (aka Pivotal Cloud Foundry) Elastic Runtime 1.6.x before 1.6.35, and PCF Elastic Runtime 1.7.x before 1.7.13 does not validate if a certificate is expired. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5007 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 3 Spring Framework, Spring Framework, Spring Security | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Both Spring Security 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 and the Spring Framework 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x rely on URL pattern mappings for authorization and for mapping requests to controllers respectively. Differences in the strictness of the pattern matching mechanisms, for example with regards to space trimming in path segments, can lead Spring Security to not recognize certain paths as not protected that are in fact mapped to Spring MVC controllers that should be protected. The problem is compounded by the fact that the Spring Framework provides richer features with regards to pattern matching as well as by the fact that pattern matching in each Spring Security and the Spring Framework can easily be customized creating additional differences. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4960 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry release v247 through v252, UAA stand-alone release v3.9.0 through v3.11.0, and UAA Bosh Release v21 through v26. There is a potential to subject the UAA OAuth clients to a denial of service attack. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3084 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The UAA reset password flow in Cloud Foundry release v236 and earlier versions, UAA release v3.3.0 and earlier versions, all versions of Login-server, UAA release v10 and earlier versions and Pivotal Elastic Runtime versions prior to 1.7.2 is vulnerable to a brute force attack due to multiple active codes at a given time. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4965 | 3 Broadcom, Debian, Pivotal Software | 3 Rabbitmq Server, Debian Linux, Rabbitmq | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. Several forms in the RabbitMQ management UI are vulnerable to XSS attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5172 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to expire password reset links. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3191 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the change_email form in UAA is vulnerable to a CSRF attack. This allows an attacker to trigger an e-mail change for a user logged into a cloud foundry instance via a malicious link on a attacker controlled site. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0781 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The UAA OAuth approval pages in Cloud Foundry v208 to v231, Login-server v1.6 to v1.14, UAA v2.0.0 to v2.7.4.1, UAA v3.0.0 to v3.2.0, UAA-Release v2 to v7 and Pivotal Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.20 are vulnerable to an XSS attack by specifying malicious java script content in either the OAuth scopes (SCIM groups) or SCIM group descriptions. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4966 | 3 Broadcom, Debian, Pivotal Software | 3 Rabbitmq Server, Debian Linux, Rabbitmq | 2025-04-20 | 2.1 LOW | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. RabbitMQ management UI stores signed-in user credentials in a browser's local storage without expiration, making it possible to retrieve them using a chained attack. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14388 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Grootfs | 2025-04-20 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Cloud Foundry Foundation GrootFS release 0.3.x versions prior to 0.30.0 do not validate DiffIDs, allowing specially crafted images to poison the grootfs volume cache. For example, this could allow an attacker to provide an image layer that GrootFS would consider to be the Ubuntu base layer. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31683 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Concourse | 2025-04-16 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Concourse (7.x.y prior to 7.8.3 and 6.x.y prior to 6.7.9) contains an authorization bypass issue. A Concourse user can send a request with body including :team_name=team2 to bypass team scope check to gain access to certain resources belong to any other team. | |||||