Total
299295 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2022-48980 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: sja1105: avoid out of bounds access in sja1105_init_l2_policing() The SJA1105 family has 45 L2 policing table entries (SJA1105_MAX_L2_POLICING_COUNT) and SJA1110 has 110 (SJA1110_MAX_L2_POLICING_COUNT). Keeping the table structure but accounting for the difference in port count (5 in SJA1105 vs 10 in SJA1110) does not fully explain the difference. Rather, the SJA1110 also has L2 ingress policers for multicast traffic. If a packet is classified as multicast, it will be processed by the policer index 99 + SRCPORT. The sja1105_init_l2_policing() function initializes all L2 policers such that they don't interfere with normal packet reception by default. To have a common code between SJA1105 and SJA1110, the index of the multicast policer for the port is calculated because it's an index that is out of bounds for SJA1105 but in bounds for SJA1110, and a bounds check is performed. The code fails to do the proper thing when determining what to do with the multicast policer of port 0 on SJA1105 (ds->num_ports = 5). The "mcast" index will be equal to 45, which is also equal to table->ops->max_entry_count (SJA1105_MAX_L2_POLICING_COUNT). So it passes through the check. But at the same time, SJA1105 doesn't have multicast policers. So the code programs the SHARINDX field of an out-of-bounds element in the L2 Policing table of the static config. The comparison between index 45 and 45 entries should have determined the code to not access this policer index on SJA1105, since its memory wasn't even allocated. With enough bad luck, the out-of-bounds write could even overwrite other valid kernel data, but in this case, the issue was detected using KASAN. Kernel log: sja1105 spi5.0: Probed switch chip: SJA1105Q ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sja1105_setup+0x1cbc/0x2340 Write of size 8 at addr ffffff880bd57708 by task kworker/u8:0/8 ... Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func Call trace: ... sja1105_setup+0x1cbc/0x2340 dsa_register_switch+0x1284/0x18d0 sja1105_probe+0x748/0x840 ... Allocated by task 8: ... sja1105_setup+0x1bcc/0x2340 dsa_register_switch+0x1284/0x18d0 sja1105_probe+0x748/0x840 ... | |||||
CVE-2024-48143 | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL | ||
A lack of rate limiting in the OTP validation component of Digitory Multi Channel Integrated POS v1.0 allows attackers to gain access to the ordering system and place an excessive amount of food orders. | |||||
CVE-2024-48142 | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
A prompt injection vulnerability in the chatbox of Butterfly Effect Limited Monica ChatGPT AI Assistant v2.4.0 allows attackers to access and exfiltrate all previous and subsequent chat data between the user and the AI assistant via a crafted message. | |||||
CVE-2022-48981 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/shmem-helper: Remove errant put in error path drm_gem_shmem_mmap() doesn't own this reference, resulting in the GEM object getting prematurely freed leading to a later use-after-free. | |||||
CVE-2024-43573 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
Windows MSHTML Platform Spoofing Vulnerability | |||||
CVE-2024-43572 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
Microsoft Management Console Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
CVE-2022-48982 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: Fix crash when replugging CSR fake controllers It seems fake CSR 5.0 clones can cause the suspend notifier to be registered twice causing the following kernel panic: [ 71.986122] Call Trace: [ 71.986124] <TASK> [ 71.986125] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x33/0x60 [ 71.986130] hci_register_dev+0x316/0x3d0 [bluetooth 99b5497ea3d09708fa1366c1dc03288bf3cca8da] [ 71.986154] btusb_probe+0x979/0xd85 [btusb e1e0605a4f4c01984a4b9c8ac58c3666ae287477] [ 71.986159] ? __pm_runtime_set_status+0x1a9/0x300 [ 71.986162] ? ktime_get_mono_fast_ns+0x3e/0x90 [ 71.986167] usb_probe_interface+0xe3/0x2b0 [ 71.986171] really_probe+0xdb/0x380 [ 71.986174] ? pm_runtime_barrier+0x54/0x90 [ 71.986177] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x170 [ 71.986180] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0x90 [ 71.986183] __device_attach_driver+0x89/0x110 [ 71.986186] ? driver_allows_async_probing+0x70/0x70 [ 71.986189] bus_for_each_drv+0x8c/0xe0 [ 71.986192] __device_attach+0xb2/0x1e0 [ 71.986195] bus_probe_device+0x92/0xb0 [ 71.986198] device_add+0x422/0x9a0 [ 71.986201] ? sysfs_merge_group+0xd4/0x110 [ 71.986205] usb_set_configuration+0x57a/0x820 [ 71.986208] usb_generic_driver_probe+0x4f/0x70 [ 71.986211] usb_probe_device+0x3a/0x110 [ 71.986213] really_probe+0xdb/0x380 [ 71.986216] ? pm_runtime_barrier+0x54/0x90 [ 71.986219] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x170 [ 71.986221] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0x90 [ 71.986224] __device_attach_driver+0x89/0x110 [ 71.986227] ? driver_allows_async_probing+0x70/0x70 [ 71.986230] bus_for_each_drv+0x8c/0xe0 [ 71.986232] __device_attach+0xb2/0x1e0 [ 71.986235] bus_probe_device+0x92/0xb0 [ 71.986237] device_add+0x422/0x9a0 [ 71.986239] ? _dev_info+0x7d/0x98 [ 71.986242] ? blake2s_update+0x4c/0xc0 [ 71.986246] usb_new_device.cold+0x148/0x36d [ 71.986250] hub_event+0xa8a/0x1910 [ 71.986255] process_one_work+0x1c4/0x380 [ 71.986259] worker_thread+0x51/0x390 [ 71.986262] ? rescuer_thread+0x3b0/0x3b0 [ 71.986264] kthread+0xdb/0x110 [ 71.986266] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 [ 71.986268] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 71.986273] </TASK> [ 71.986274] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 71.986284] btusb: probe of 2-1.6:1.0 failed with error -17 | |||||
CVE-2024-44098 | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH | ||
In lwis_device_event_states_clear_locked of lwis_event.c, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a double free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
CVE-2024-10229 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 130.0.6723.69 allowed a remote attacker to bypass site isolation via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
CVE-2024-10231 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 130.0.6723.69 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
CVE-2024-40493 | 1 Keith-cullen | 1 Freecoap | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
Null Pointer Dereference in `coap_client_exchange_blockwise2` function in Keith Cullen FreeCoAP 1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and potentially execute arbitrary code via a specially crafted CoAP packet that causes `coap_msg_get_payload(resp)` to return a null pointer, which is then dereferenced in a call to `memcpy`. | |||||
CVE-2024-44812 | 1 Janobe | 1 Online Complaint Site | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
SQL Injection vulnerability in Online Complaint Site v.1.0 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the username and password parameters in the /admin.index.php component. | |||||
CVE-2024-9947 | 1 Properfraction | 1 Profilepress | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
The ProfilePress Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass in all versions up to, and including, 4.11.1. This is due to insufficient verification on the user being returned by the social login token. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as any existing user on the site, such as an administrator, if they have access to the email and the user does not have an already-existing account for the service returning the token. | |||||
CVE-2024-48652 | 1 Tuzitio | 1 Camaleon Cms | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in camaleon-cms v.2.7.5 allows remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the content group name field. | |||||
CVE-2024-8500 | 1 Getshortcodes | 1 Shortcodes Ultimate | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
The WP Shortcodes Plugin ā Shortcodes Ultimate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the several parameters in all versions up to, and including, 7.2.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | |||||
CVE-2024-10250 | 1 Steelthemes | 1 Nioland | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
The Nioland theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the āsā parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
CVE-2024-48540 | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM | ||
Incorrect access control in XIAO HE Smart 4.3.1 allows attackers to access sensitive information by analyzing the code and data within the APK file. | |||||
CVE-2024-9829 | 1 Metagauss | 1 Download Plugin | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
The Download Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability checks on the 'dpwap_handle_download_user' and 'dpwap_handle_download_comment' functions in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to download any comment, and download metadata for any user including user PII and sensitive information including username, email, hashed passwords and application passwords, session token information and more depending on set up and additional plugins installed. | |||||
CVE-2024-30158 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a SQL Injection attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary database and management operations. | |||||
CVE-2024-9927 | 1 Wpovernight | 1 Woocommerce Order Proposal | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
The WooCommerce Order Proposal plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation via order proposal in all versions up to and including 2.0.5. This is due to the improper implementation of allow_payment_without_login function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Shop Manager-level access and above, to log in to WordPress as an arbitrary user account, including administrators. |