Total
276773 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2006-7084 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7083. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-7083. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-7083 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2006-3432 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0028. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-0028. The original assigner switched to a new CVE number. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0028 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-6132 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5553 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4158. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4158. It was based on a vague pre-advisory, so the duplicate was not detected until more details were provided. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4158 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5285 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5280. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5280. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5280 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5763 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0401. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-0401. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0401 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2006-6100 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2007-0818 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0396. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0396. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0396 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5670 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5956. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5956. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5956 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2006-7224 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7227, CVE-2005-4872, CVE-2006-7228. Reason: this candidate was SPLIT into other identifiers in order to reflect different affected versions and distinct vendor fixes. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2006-7227, CVE-2005-4872, and CVE-2006-7228 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-1323 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2893. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but some sources used this identifier for a separate issue, and a duplicate identifier had also been created by the time dual use was detected. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2007-2893 to determine if it is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5908 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** Buffer overflow in the (1) sysfs_show_available_clocksources and (2) sysfs_show_current_clocksources functions in Linux kernel 2.6.23 and earlier might allow local users to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via crafted clock source names. NOTE: follow-on analysis by Linux developers states that "There is no way for unprivileged users (or really even the root user) to add new clocksources." | |||||
| CVE-2007-0234 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0243. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0243. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0243 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-1752 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1499. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1499. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1499 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-6447 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6114. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6114. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6114 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-2056 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** The getlock function in aimage/aimage.cpp in AFFLIB 2.2.8 and earlier allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on temporary lock files (aka "time-of-check-time-of-use file race"). NOTE: the researcher has retracted the original advisory, stating that "the portion of vulnerable code is not called in any current version of AFFLIB and is therefore not exploitable." | |||||
| CVE-2006-6099 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5021 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4880. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4880. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4880 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5288 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5283. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5283. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5283 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4019 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2930. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-2930. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2930 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||