Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Total 275089 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2006-6492 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none.
CVE-2008-0929 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2007-6034 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6062. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6062. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6062 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
CVE-2008-1271 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1218. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-1218. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1218 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
CVE-2008-0189 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a new security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2007-1769 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1873. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1873. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1873 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
CVE-2007-4044 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** The MS-RPC functionality in smbd in Samba 3 on SUSE Linux before 20070720 does not include "one character in the shell escape handling." NOTE: this issue was originally characterized as a shell metacharacter issue due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2007-2447, which was interpreted by CVE to be security relevant. However, SUSE and Red Hat have disputed the problem, stating that the only impact is that scripts will not be executed if they have a "c" in their name, but even this limitation might not exist. This does not have security implications, so should not be included in CVE.
CVE-2007-5586 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5587. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5587 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
CVE-2007-1356 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2006-5756 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none.
CVE-2008-0188 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a new security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2007-1627 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4606. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4606. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4606 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
CVE-2007-5421 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Cisco IOS 12.x and IOS XR allow attackers to execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated via the "Bind Shell", "Reverse Shell", and "Two byte rootshell (Tiny Shell)" attacks. NOTE: the vendor and researcher agree that this issue does not cross privilege boundaries, saying they do not "represent a vulnerability." The disclosure was intended to demonstrate techniques for exploitation, which is not covered by CVE.
CVE-2008-1112 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0928. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0928. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0928 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
CVE-2007-3595 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3399. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3399. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3399 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
CVE-2007-6442 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6114. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6114. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6114 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
CVE-2006-7084 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7083. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-7083. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-7083 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
CVE-2006-3432 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0028. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-0028. The original assigner switched to a new CVE number. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0028 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
CVE-2007-6132 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2007-5553 2024-02-04 N/A N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4158. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4158. It was based on a vague pre-advisory, so the duplicate was not detected until more details were provided. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4158 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.