Total
274684 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-2645 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2408. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2408. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2408 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2009-4132 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-4214. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-4214. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-4214 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2086 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1900. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1900. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1900 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2009-1205 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4475. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4475. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4475 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-5850 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate was originally recorded for a "SPLAT Remote Root Exploit" that was claimed to exist for Check Point SmartCenter. The claim has no actionable details and was disclosed by a person of unknown reliability who did not coordinate with the vendor. No people of known reliability have confirmed the original claim. The vendor has not indicated that they are aware of any vulnerability. Since the claim has no actionable details or independent verification, it is outside the scope of CVE according to current inclusion criteria. | |||||
| CVE-2008-4826 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3853. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3853. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3853 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2009-3908 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3608. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3608. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3608 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-6049 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** SQL injection vulnerability in index.php in TinyMCE 2.0.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the menuID parameter. NOTE: CVE and multiple reliable third parties dispute this issue, since TinyMCE does not contain index.php or any PHP code. This may be an issue in a product that has integrated TinyMCE. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0795 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0796, CVE-2009-1265. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but a typo caused it to be associated with a different issue. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2009-0796 and CVE-2009-1265 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0242 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** gmetad in Ganglia 3.1.1, when supporting multiple requests per connection on an interactive port, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a request to the gmetad service with a path that does not exist, which causes Ganglia to (1) perform excessive CPU computation and (2) send the entire tree, which consumes network bandwidth. NOTE: the vendor and original researcher have disputed this issue, since legitimate requests can generate the same amount of resource consumption. CVE concurs with the dispute, so this identifier should not be used. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0671 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** Format string vulnerability in the University of Washington (UW) c-client library, as used by the UW IMAP toolkit imap-2007d and other applications, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the initial request to the IMAP port (143/tcp). NOTE: Red Hat has disputed the vulnerability, stating "The Red Hat Security Response Team have been unable to confirm the existence of this format string vulnerability in the toolkit, and the sample published exploit is not complete or functional." CVE agrees that the exploit contains syntax errors and uses Unix-only include files while invoking Windows functions. | |||||
| CVE-2008-4312 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2008-2033 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1381. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-1381. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1381 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2009-3870 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3870. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3870. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3870 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-4112 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3195. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3195. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3195 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2962 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2692. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2692. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2692 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3517 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3522. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3522. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3522 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-6176 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-6171. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-6171. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-6171 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-2737 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3558. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3558. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3558 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3120 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3363. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3363. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3363 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||