Total
274455 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-0242 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** gmetad in Ganglia 3.1.1, when supporting multiple requests per connection on an interactive port, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a request to the gmetad service with a path that does not exist, which causes Ganglia to (1) perform excessive CPU computation and (2) send the entire tree, which consumes network bandwidth. NOTE: the vendor and original researcher have disputed this issue, since legitimate requests can generate the same amount of resource consumption. CVE concurs with the dispute, so this identifier should not be used. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0671 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** Format string vulnerability in the University of Washington (UW) c-client library, as used by the UW IMAP toolkit imap-2007d and other applications, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the initial request to the IMAP port (143/tcp). NOTE: Red Hat has disputed the vulnerability, stating "The Red Hat Security Response Team have been unable to confirm the existence of this format string vulnerability in the toolkit, and the sample published exploit is not complete or functional." CVE agrees that the exploit contains syntax errors and uses Unix-only include files while invoking Windows functions. | |||||
| CVE-2008-4312 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2008-2033 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1381. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-1381. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1381 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2009-3870 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3870. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3870. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3870 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-4112 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3195. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3195. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3195 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2962 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2692. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2692. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2692 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3517 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3522. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3522. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3522 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-6176 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-6171. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-6171. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-6171 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-2737 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3558. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3558. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3558 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3120 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3363. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3363. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3363 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0589 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4168 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4168. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4168. It was inadvertently used in a vendor advisory when the "2006" year was intended. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4168 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4274 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4275. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4275. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4275 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2006-4854 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Office 2000 (Chinese Edition) and Microsoft PowerPoint 2000 (Chinese Edition) allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PPT document, as exploited by malware such as Trojan.PPDropper.E. NOTE: on 20060919, Microsoft notified CVE that this is a duplicate of CVE-2006-0009. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5317 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5292. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5292. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5292 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-3801 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3699. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3699. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3699 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4721 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6113. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6113. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6113 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2007-6440 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6112. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6112. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6112 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2006-6362 | 2024-02-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-5873. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-5873. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-5873 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||