Total
31 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-1126 | 2025-02-11 | N/A | 9.3 CRITICAL | ||
| A Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability has been identified in the Lexmark Print Management Client. | |||||
| CVE-2025-24369 | 2025-01-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Anubis is a tool that allows administrators to protect bots against AI scrapers through bot-checking heuristics and a proof-of-work challenge to discourage scraping from multiple IP addresses. Anubis allows attackers to bypass the bot protection by requesting a challenge, formulates any nonce (such as 42069), and then passes the challenge with difficulty zero. Commit e09d0226a628f04b1d80fd83bee777894a45cd02 fixes this behavior by not using a client-specified difficulty value. | |||||
| CVE-2024-9310 | 2025-01-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| By utilizing software-defined radios and a custom low-latency processing pipeline, RF signals with spoofed location data can be transmitted to aircraft targets. This can lead to the appearance of fake aircraft on displays and potentially trigger undesired Resolution Advisories (RAs). | |||||
| CVE-2024-28824 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-12-04 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Least privilege violation and reliance on untrusted inputs in the mk_informix Checkmk agent plugin before Checkmk 2.3.0b4 (beta), 2.2.0p24, 2.1.0p41 and 2.0.0 (EOL) allows local users to escalate privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2024-28829 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-12-03 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Least privilege violation and reliance on untrusted inputs in the mk_informix Checkmk agent plugin before Checkmk 2.3.0p12, 2.2.0p32, 2.1.0p47 and 2.0.0 (EOL) allows local users to escalate privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2023-45128 | 1 Gofiber | 1 Fiber | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Fiber is an express inspired web framework written in Go. A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the application, which allows an attacker to inject arbitrary values and forge malicious requests on behalf of a user. This vulnerability can allow an attacker to inject arbitrary values without any authentication, or perform various malicious actions on behalf of an authenticated user, potentially compromising the security and integrity of the application. The vulnerability is caused by improper validation and enforcement of CSRF tokens within the application. This issue has been addressed in version 2.50.0 and users are advised to upgrade. Users should take additional security measures like captchas or Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) and set Session cookies with SameSite=Lax or SameSite=Secure, and the Secure and HttpOnly attributes as defense in depth measures. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-24400 | 1 Midnightblue | 1 Tetra\ | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw in the TETRA authentication procecure allows a MITM adversary that can predict the MS challenge RAND2 to set session key DCK to zero. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31999 | 1 Rancher | 1 Rancher | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability in Rancher allows users in the cluster to act as others users in the cluster by forging the "Impersonate-User" or "Impersonate-Group" headers. This issue affects: Rancher versions prior to 2.5.9. Rancher versions prior to 2.4.16. | |||||
| CVE-2024-51561 | 1 63moons | 2 Aero, Wave 2.0 | 2024-11-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| This vulnerability exists in Aero due to improper implementation of OTP validation mechanism in certain API endpoints. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting and manipulating the responses exchanged during the second factor authentication process. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to bypass OTP verification for accessing other user accounts. | |||||
| CVE-2024-21510 | 2024-11-01 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Versions of the package sinatra from 0.0.0 are vulnerable to Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision via the X-Forwarded-Host (XFH) header. When making a request to a method with redirect applied, it is possible to trigger an Open Redirect Attack by inserting an arbitrary address into this header. If used for caching purposes, such as with servers like Nginx, or as a reverse proxy, without handling the X-Forwarded-Host header, attackers can potentially exploit Cache Poisoning or Routing-based SSRF. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7005 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-08-07 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Safe Browsing in Google Chrome prior to 127.0.6533.72 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to bypass discretionary access control via a malicious file. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||