Total
11148 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-1000300 | 2 Canonical, Haxx | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Curl | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| curl version curl 7.54.1 to and including curl 7.59.0 contains a CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in denial of service and more that can result in curl might overflow a heap based memory buffer when closing down an FTP connection with very long server command replies.. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in curl < 7.54.1 and curl >= 7.60.0. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000178 | 2 Debian, Quassel-irc | 2 Debian Linux, Quassel | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A heap corruption of type CWE-120 exists in quassel version 0.12.4 in quasselcore in void DataStreamPeer::processMessage(const QByteArray &msg) datastreampeer.cpp line 62 that allows an attacker to execute code remotely. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000140 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| rsyslog librelp version 1.2.14 and earlier contains a Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the checking of x509 certificates from a peer that can result in Remote code execution. This attack appear to be exploitable a remote attacker that can connect to rsyslog and trigger a stack buffer overflow by sending a specially crafted x509 certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000120 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Haxx and 2 more | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Curl and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A buffer overflow exists in curl 7.12.3 to and including curl 7.58.0 in the FTP URL handling that allows an attacker to cause a denial of service or worse. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000116 | 2 Debian, Net-snmp | 2 Debian Linux, Net-snmp | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| NET-SNMP version 5.7.2 contains a heap corruption vulnerability in the UDP protocol handler that can result in command execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000038 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mupdf | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex MuPDF 1.12.0 and earlier, a stack buffer overflow in function pdf_lookup_cmap_full in pdf/pdf-cmap.c could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000035 | 1 Unzip Project | 1 Unzip | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A heap-based buffer overflow exists in Info-Zip UnZip version <= 6.00 in the processing of password-protected archives that allows an attacker to perform a denial of service or to possibly achieve code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000032 | 1 Info-zip | 1 Unzip | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A heap-based buffer overflow exists in Info-Zip UnZip version 6.10c22 that allows an attacker to perform a denial of service or to possibly achieve code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000031 | 1 Info-zip | 1 Unzip | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A heap-based buffer overflow exists in Info-Zip UnZip version 6.10c22 that allows an attacker to perform a denial of service or to possibly achieve code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000030 | 2 Canonical, Python | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Python | 2024-11-21 | 3.3 LOW | 3.6 LOW |
| Python 2.7.14 is vulnerable to a Heap-Buffer-Overflow as well as a Heap-Use-After-Free. Python versions prior to 2.7.14 may also be vulnerable and it appears that Python 2.7.17 and prior may also be vulnerable however this has not been confirmed. The vulnerability lies when multiply threads are handling large amounts of data. In both cases there is essentially a race condition that occurs. For the Heap-Buffer-Overflow, Thread 2 is creating the size for a buffer, but Thread1 is already writing to the buffer without knowing how much to write. So when a large amount of data is being processed, it is very easy to cause memory corruption using a Heap-Buffer-Overflow. As for the Use-After-Free, Thread3->Malloc->Thread1->Free's->Thread2-Re-uses-Free'd Memory. The PSRT has stated that this is not a security vulnerability due to the fact that the attacker must be able to run code, however in some situations, such as function as a service, this vulnerability can potentially be used by an attacker to violate a trust boundary, as such the DWF feels this issue deserves a CVE. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000001 | 3 Canonical, Gnu, Redhat | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Glibc, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| In glibc 2.26 and earlier there is confusion in the usage of getcwd() by realpath() which can be used to write before the destination buffer leading to a buffer underflow and potential code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0997 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Internet Explorer improperly accesses objects in memory, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 11. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0870, CVE-2018-0991, CVE-2018-1018, CVE-2018-1020. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0996 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 9, Internet Explorer 11, Internet Explorer 10. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0988, CVE-2018-1001. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0995 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0979, CVE-2018-0980, CVE-2018-0990, CVE-2018-0993, CVE-2018-0994, CVE-2018-1019. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0994 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0979, CVE-2018-0980, CVE-2018-0990, CVE-2018-0993, CVE-2018-0995, CVE-2018-1019. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0993 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0979, CVE-2018-0980, CVE-2018-0990, CVE-2018-0994, CVE-2018-0995, CVE-2018-1019. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0991 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Internet Explorer improperly accesses objects in memory, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 11, Internet Explorer 10. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0870, CVE-2018-0997, CVE-2018-1018, CVE-2018-1020. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0990 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0979, CVE-2018-0980, CVE-2018-0993, CVE-2018-0994, CVE-2018-0995, CVE-2018-1019. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0989 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka "Scripting Engine Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 9, Internet Explorer 11, Internet Explorer 10. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0981, CVE-2018-0987, CVE-2018-1000. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0988 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 9, Internet Explorer 11, Internet Explorer 10. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0996, CVE-2018-1001. | |||||