Total
11941 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-61837 | 1 Adobe | 1 Format Plugins | 2025-11-13 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Format Plugins versions 1.1.1 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61838 | 1 Adobe | 1 Format Plugins | 2025-11-13 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Format Plugins versions 1.1.1 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2025-12875 | 2025-11-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A weakness has been identified in mruby 3.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function ary_fill_exec of the file mrbgems/mruby-array-ext/src/array.c. Executing manipulation of the argument start/length can lead to out-of-bounds write. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This patch is called 93619f06dd378db6766666b30c08978311c7ec94. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-64406 | 1 Apache | 1 Openoffice | 2025-11-13 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Apache OpenOffice could allow an attacker to craft a document that would crash the program, or otherwise corrupt other memory areas. This issue affects Apache OpenOffice: through 4.1.15. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.1.16, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-37810 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: dwc3: gadget: check that event count does not exceed event buffer length The event count is read from register DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT. There is a check for the count being zero, but not for exceeding the event buffer length. Check that event count does not exceed event buffer length, avoiding an out-of-bounds access when memcpy'ing the event. Crash log: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffc0129be000 pc : __memcpy+0x114/0x180 lr : dwc3_check_event_buf+0xec/0x348 x3 : 0000000000000030 x2 : 000000000000dfc4 x1 : ffffffc0129be000 x0 : ffffff87aad60080 Call trace: __memcpy+0x114/0x180 dwc3_interrupt+0x24/0x34 | |||||
| CVE-2023-53077 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: fix shift-out-of-bounds in CalculateVMAndRowBytes [WHY] When PTEBufferSizeInRequests is zero, UBSAN reports the following warning because dml_log2 returns an unexpected negative value: shift exponent 4294966273 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' [HOW] In the case PTEBufferSizeInRequests is zero, skip the dml_log2() and assign the result directly. | |||||
| CVE-2023-53081 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: fix data corruption after failed write When buffered write fails to copy data into underlying page cache page, ocfs2_write_end_nolock() just zeroes out and dirties the page. This can leave dirty page beyond EOF and if page writeback tries to write this page before write succeeds and expands i_size, page gets into inconsistent state where page dirty bit is clear but buffer dirty bits stay set resulting in page data never getting written and so data copied to the page is lost. Fix the problem by invalidating page beyond EOF after failed write. | |||||
| CVE-2023-53065 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf/core: Fix perf_output_begin parameter is incorrectly invoked in perf_event_bpf_output syzkaller reportes a KASAN issue with stack-out-of-bounds. The call trace is as follows: dump_stack+0x9c/0xd3 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x19/0x170 __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 __perf_event_header__init_id+0x34/0x290 perf_event_header__init_id+0x48/0x60 perf_output_begin+0x4a4/0x560 perf_event_bpf_output+0x161/0x1e0 perf_iterate_sb_cpu+0x29e/0x340 perf_iterate_sb+0x4c/0xc0 perf_event_bpf_event+0x194/0x2c0 __bpf_prog_put.constprop.0+0x55/0xf0 __cls_bpf_delete_prog+0xea/0x120 [cls_bpf] cls_bpf_delete_prog_work+0x1c/0x30 [cls_bpf] process_one_work+0x3c2/0x730 worker_thread+0x93/0x650 kthread+0x1b8/0x210 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 commit 267fb27352b6 ("perf: Reduce stack usage of perf_output_begin()") use on-stack struct perf_sample_data of the caller function. However, perf_event_bpf_output uses incorrect parameter to convert small-sized data (struct perf_bpf_event) into large-sized data (struct perf_sample_data), which causes memory overwriting occurs in __perf_event_header__init_id. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61831 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Illustrator, Macos, Windows | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Illustrator versions 28.7.10, 29.8.2 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61820 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Illustrator, Macos, Windows | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Illustrator versions 28.7.10, 29.8.2 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61819 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Photoshop, Macos, Windows | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Photoshop Desktop versions 26.8.1 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61832 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Indesign, Macos, Windows | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| InDesign Desktop versions 20.5, 19.5.5 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61824 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Indesign, Macos, Windows | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| InDesign Desktop versions 20.5, 19.5.5 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61816 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Incopy, Macos, Windows | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| InCopy versions 20.5, 19.5.5 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61828 | 1 Adobe | 1 Illustrator On Ipad | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Illustrator on iPad versions 3.0.9 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61829 | 1 Adobe | 1 Illustrator On Ipad | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Illustrator on iPad versions 3.0.9 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61827 | 1 Adobe | 1 Illustrator On Ipad | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Illustrator on iPad versions 3.0.9 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2025-42940 | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| SAP CommonCryptoLib does not perform necessary boundary checks during pre-authentication parsing of manipulated ASN.1 data over the network. This may result in memory corruption followed by an application crash, hence leading to a high impact on availability. There is no impact on confidentiality or integrity. | |||||
| CVE-2025-27713 | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH | ||
| Out-of-bounds write for some Intel(R) QAT Windows software before version 2.6.0. within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33029 | 2025-11-12 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH | ||
| Out-of-bounds write for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi Software for Windows before version 23.160 within Ring 2: Device Drivers may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via adjacent access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) impacts. | |||||