Total
43 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-34574 | 1 Mbconnectline | 2 Mbconnect24, Mymbconnect24 | 2024-02-04 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In MB connect line mymbCONNECT24, mbCONNECT24 and Helmholz myREX24 and myREX24.virtual in all versions through v2.11.2 an authenticated attacker can change the password of his account into a new password that violates the password policy by intercepting and modifying the request that is send to the server. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29960 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2024-02-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Firefox used to cache the last filename used for printing a file. When generating a filename for printing, Firefox usually suggests the web page title. The caching and suggestion techniques combined may have lead to the title of a website visited during private browsing mode being stored on disk. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 89. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27268 | 1 Sooil | 6 Anydana-a, Anydana-a Firmware, Anydana-i and 3 more | 2024-02-04 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, a client-side control vulnerability in the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications allows physically proximate attackers to bypass checks for default PINs via Bluetooth Low Energy. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20411 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Verify Information Queue, Linux Kernel | 2024-02-04 | 4.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| IBM Security Verify Information Queue 1.0.6 and 1.0.7 could allow a user to impersonate another user on the system due to incorrectly updating the session identifier. IBM X-Force ID: 198191. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15257 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Linuxfoundation | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Containerd | 2024-02-04 | 3.6 LOW | 5.2 MEDIUM |
| containerd is an industry-standard container runtime and is available as a daemon for Linux and Windows. In containerd before versions 1.3.9 and 1.4.3, the containerd-shim API is improperly exposed to host network containers. Access controls for the shim’s API socket verified that the connecting process had an effective UID of 0, but did not otherwise restrict access to the abstract Unix domain socket. This would allow malicious containers running in the same network namespace as the shim, with an effective UID of 0 but otherwise reduced privileges, to cause new processes to be run with elevated privileges. This vulnerability has been fixed in containerd 1.3.9 and 1.4.3. Users should update to these versions as soon as they are released. It should be noted that containers started with an old version of containerd-shim should be stopped and restarted, as running containers will continue to be vulnerable even after an upgrade. If you are not providing the ability for untrusted users to start containers in the same network namespace as the shim (typically the "host" network namespace, for example with docker run --net=host or hostNetwork: true in a Kubernetes pod) and run with an effective UID of 0, you are not vulnerable to this issue. If you are running containers with a vulnerable configuration, you can deny access to all abstract sockets with AppArmor by adding a line similar to deny unix addr=@**, to your policy. It is best practice to run containers with a reduced set of privileges, with a non-zero UID, and with isolated namespaces. The containerd maintainers strongly advise against sharing namespaces with the host. Reducing the set of isolation mechanisms used for a container necessarily increases that container's privilege, regardless of what container runtime is used for running that container. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24683 | 1 Abb | 2 Symphony \+ Historian, Symphony \+ Operations | 2024-02-04 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The affected versions of S+ Operations (version 2.1 SP1 and earlier) used an approach for user authentication which relies on validation at the client node (client-side authentication). This is not as secure as having the server validate a client application before allowing a connection. Therefore, if the network communication or endpoints for these applications are not protected, unauthorized actors can bypass authentication and make unauthorized connections to the server application. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1048 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-02-04 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly allows arbitrary writing to the file system, aka 'Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1070. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15892 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 2 Dap-1520 Firmware, Dap-1520 | 2024-02-04 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in apply.cgi on D-Link DAP-1520 devices before 1.10b04Beta02. Whenever a user performs a login action from the web interface, the request values are being forwarded to the ssi binary. On the login page, the web interface restricts the password input field to a fixed length of 15 characters. The problem is that validation is being done on the client side, hence it can be bypassed. When an attacker manages to intercept the login request (POST based) and tampers with the vulnerable parameter (log_pass), to a larger length, the request will be forwarded to the webserver. This results in a stack-based buffer overflow. A few other POST variables, (transferred as part of the login request) are also vulnerable: html_response_page and log_user. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13025 | 1 Compal | 2 Ch7465lg, Ch7465lg Firmware | 2024-02-04 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Compal CH7465LG CH7465LG-NCIP-6.12.18.24-5p8-NOSH devices have Incorrect Access Control because of Improper Input Validation. The attacker can send a maliciously modified POST (HTTP) request containing shell commands, which will be executed on the device, to an backend API endpoint of the cable modem. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6862 | 1 Zte | 2 F6x2w, F6x2w Firmware | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| V6.0.10P2T2 and V6.0.10P2T5 of F6x2W product are impacted by Information leak vulnerability. Unauthorized users could log in directly to obtain page information without entering a verification code. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2979 | 1 Freebsd | 1 Name Server Daemon | 2024-02-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| FreeBSD NSD before 3.2.13 allows remote attackers to crash a NSD child server process (SIGSEGV) and cause a denial of service in the NSD server. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10248 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Vorto | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Eclipse Vorto versions prior to 0.11 resolved Maven build artifacts for the Xtext project over HTTP instead of HTTPS. Any of these dependent artifacts could have been maliciously compromised by a MITM attack. Hence produced build artifacts of Vorto might be infected. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11770 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Buildship | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| In Eclipse Buildship versions prior to 3.1.1, the build files indicate that this project is resolving dependencies over HTTP instead of HTTPS. Any of these artifacts could have been MITM to maliciously compromise them and infect the build artifacts that were produced. Additionally, if any of these JARs or other dependencies were compromised, any developers using these could continue to be infected past updating to fix this. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13266 | 1 Tp-link | 4 Archer C2 V1, Archer C2 V1 Firmware, Archer C3200 V1 and 1 more | 2024-02-04 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| TP-Link Archer C3200 V1 and Archer C2 V1 devices have Insufficient Compartmentalization between a host network and a guest network that are established by the same device. A DHCP Request is sent to the router with a certain Transaction ID field. Following the DHCP protocol, the router responds with an ACK or NAK message. Studying the NAK case revealed that the router erroneously sends the NAK to both Host and Guest networks with the same Transaction ID as found in the DHCP Request. This allows encoding of data to be sent cross-router into the 32-bit Transaction ID field. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13263 | 1 Dlink | 2 Dir-825\/ac G1, Dir-825\/ac G1 Firmware | 2024-02-04 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| D-link DIR-825AC G1 devices have Insufficient Compartmentalization between a host network and a guest network that are established by the same device. A DHCP Request is sent to the router with a certain Transaction ID field. Following the DHCP protocol, the router responds with an ACK or NAK message. Studying the NAK case revealed that the router erroneously sends the NAK to both Host and Guest networks with the same Transaction ID as found in the DHCP Request. This allows encoding of data to be sent cross-router into the 32-bit Transaction ID field. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17791 | 1 Newgensoft | 1 Omniflow Intelligent Business Process Suite | 2024-02-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Newgen OmniFlow Intelligent Business Process Suite (iBPS) 7.0 has an "improper server side validation" vulnerability where client-side validations are tampered, and inappropriate information is stored on the server side and fetched from the server every time the user visits the D, creating business confusion. In the worst case, all available resources are consumed while processing the data, resulting in unavailability of the service to legitimate users. This occurs because non-editable parameters can be modified by manually editing a disabled form field within the developer options. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10753 | 1 Diffplug | 3 Eclipse-cdt, Eclipse-groovy, Eclipse-wtp | 2024-02-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In all versions prior to version 3.9.6 for eclipse-wtp, all versions prior to version 9.4.4 for eclipse-cdt, and all versions prior to version 3.0.1 for eclipse-groovy, Spotless was resolving dependencies over an insecure channel (http). If the build occurred over an insecure connection, a malicious user could have perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack during the build and alter the build artifacts that were produced. In case that any of these artifacts were compromised, any developers using these could be altered. **Note:** In order to validate that this artifact was not compromised, the maintainer would need to confirm that none of the artifacts published to the registry were not altered with. Until this happens, we can not guarantee that this artifact was not compromised even though the probability that this happened is low. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1020011 | 1 Charcoal-se | 1 Smokedetector | 2024-02-04 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| SmokeDetector intentionally does automatic deployments of updated copies of SmokeDetector without server operator authority. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11875 | 1 Blueprism | 1 Robotic Process Automation | 2024-02-04 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In AutomateAppCore.dll in Blue Prism Robotic Process Automation 6.4.0.8445, a vulnerability in access control can be exploited to escalate privileges. The vulnerability allows for abusing the application for fraud or unauthorized access to certain information. The attack requires a valid user account to connect to the Blue Prism server, but the roles associated to this account are not required to have any permissions. First of all, the application files are modified to grant full permissions on the client side. In a test environment (or his own instance of the software) an attacker is able to grant himself full privileges also on the server side. He can then, for instance, create a process with malicious behavior and export it to disk. With the modified client, it is possible to import the exported file as a release and overwrite any existing process in the database. Eventually, the bots execute the malicious process. The server does not check the user's permissions for the aforementioned actions, such that a modification of the client software enables this kind of attack. Possible scenarios may involve changing bank accounts or setting passwords. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14013 | 1 Prominent | 2 Multiflex M10a Controller, Multiflex M10a Controller Firmware | 2024-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 5.6 MEDIUM |
| A Client-Side Enforcement of Server-Side Security issue was discovered in ProMinent MultiFLEX M10a Controller web interface. The log out function in the application removes the user's session only on the client side. This may allow an attacker to bypass protection mechanisms, gain privileges, or assume the identity of an authenticated user. | |||||