Total
7365 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-9203 | 1 Huawei | 2 P30, P30 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| There is a resource management errors vulnerability in Huawei P30. Local attackers construct broadcast message for some application, causing this application to send this broadcast message and impact the customer's use experience. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9102 | 1 Huawei | 8 Cloudengine 12800, Cloudengine 12800 Firmware, Cloudengine 5800 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| There is a information leak vulnerability in some Huawei products, and it could allow a local attacker to get information. The vulnerability is due to the improper management of the username. An attacker with the ability to access the device and cause the username information leak. Affected product versions include: CloudEngine 12800 versions V200R002C50SPC800, V200R003C00SPC810, V200R005C00SPC800, V200R005C10SPC800, V200R019C00SPC800; CloudEngine 5800 versions V200R002C50SPC800, V200R003C00SPC810, V200R005C00SPC800, V200R005C10SPC800, V200R019C00SPC800; CloudEngine 6800 versions V200R002C50SPC800, V200R003C00SPC810, V200R005C00SPC800, V200R005C10SPC800, V200R005C20SPC800, V200R019C00SPC800; CloudEngine 7800 versions V200R002C50SPC800, V200R003C00SPC810, V200R005C00SPC800, V200R005C10SPC800, V200R019C00SPC800 | |||||
| CVE-2020-9083 | 1 Huawei | 2 Mate 20, Mate 20 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 2.4 LOW |
| HUAWEI Mate 20 smart phones with Versions earlier than 10.1.0.163(C00E160R3P8) have a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability. The attacker can enter a large amount of text on the phone. Due to insufficient verification of the parameter, successful exploitation can impact the service. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9077 | 1 Huawei | 2 P30, P30 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| HUAWEI P30 smart phones with versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R2P11) have an information exposure vulnerability. The system does not properly authenticate the application that access a specified interface. Attackers can trick users into installing malicious software to exploit this vulnerability and obtain some information about the device. Successful exploit may cause information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9073 | 1 Huawei | 2 P20, P20 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 2.4 LOW |
| Huawei P20 smartphones with versions earlier than 10.0.0.156(C00E156R1P4) have an improper authentication vulnerability. The vulnerability is due to that when an user wants to do certain operation, the software insufficiently validate the user's identity. Attackers need to physically access the smartphone to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the limit of student mode function. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9056 | 1 Periscopeholdings | 1 Buyspeed | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 3.9 LOW |
| Periscope BuySpeed version 14.5 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting, which could allow a local, authenticated attacker to store arbitrary JavaScript within the application. This JavaScript is subsequently displayed by the application without sanitization and is executed in the browser of the user, which could possibly cause website redirection, session hijacking, or information disclosure. This vulnerability has been patched in BuySpeed version 15.3. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9055 | 1 Versiant | 1 Lynx Customer Service Portal | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 3.9 LOW |
| Versiant LYNX Customer Service Portal (CSP), version 3.5.2, is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting, which could allow a local, authenticated attacker to insert malicious JavaScript that is stored and displayed to the end user. This could lead to website redirects, session cookie hijacking, or information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8991 | 1 Redhat | 1 Lvm2 | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 2.3 LOW |
| ** DISPUTED ** vg_lookup in daemons/lvmetad/lvmetad-core.c in LVM2 2.02 mismanages memory, leading to an lvmetad memory leak, as demonstrated by running pvs. NOTE: RedHat disputes CVE-2020-8991 as not being a vulnerability since there’s no apparent route to either privilege escalation or to denial of service through the bug. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8956 | 2 Microsoft, Pulsesecure | 2 Windows, Pulse Secure Desktop | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| Pulse Secure Desktop Client 9.0Rx before 9.0R5 and 9.1Rx before 9.1R4 on Windows reveals users' passwords if Save Settings is enabled. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8920 | 1 Google | 1 Gerrit | 2024-11-21 | 2.7 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
| An information leak vulnerability exists in Gerrit versions prior to 2.14.22, 2.15.21, 2.16.25, 3.0.15, 3.1.10, 3.2.5 where an overoptimization with the FilteredRepository wrapper skips the verification of access on All-Users repositories, allowing an attacker to get read access to all users' personal information associated with their accounts. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8919 | 1 Google | 1 Gerrit | 2024-11-21 | 2.7 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
| An information leak vulnerability exists in Gerrit versions prior to 2.15.21, 2.16.25, 3.0.15, 3.1.10, 3.2.5 where a missing access check on the branch REST API allows an attacker with only the default set of priviledges to read all other user's personal account data as well as sub-trees with restricted access. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8912 | 1 Amazon | 1 Aws S3 Crypto Sdk | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 2.5 LOW |
| A vulnerability in the in-band key negotiation exists in the AWS S3 Crypto SDK for GoLang versions prior to V2. An attacker with write access to the targeted bucket can change the encryption algorithm of an object in the bucket, which can then allow them to change AES-GCM to AES-CTR. Using this in combination with a decryption oracle can reveal the authentication key used by AES-GCM as decrypting the GMAC tag leaves the authentication key recoverable as an algebraic equation. It is recommended to update your SDK to V2 or later, and re-encrypt your files. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8908 | 4 Google, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 13 Guava, Active Iq Unified Manager, Commerce Guided Search and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| A temp directory creation vulnerability exists in all versions of Guava, allowing an attacker with access to the machine to potentially access data in a temporary directory created by the Guava API com.google.common.io.Files.createTempDir(). By default, on unix-like systems, the created directory is world-readable (readable by an attacker with access to the system). The method in question has been marked @Deprecated in versions 30.0 and later and should not be used. For Android developers, we recommend choosing a temporary directory API provided by Android, such as context.getCacheDir(). For other Java developers, we recommend migrating to the Java 7 API java.nio.file.Files.createTempDirectory() which explicitly configures permissions of 700, or configuring the Java runtime's java.io.tmpdir system property to point to a location whose permissions are appropriately configured. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8905 | 1 Google | 1 Asylo | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 2.8 LOW |
| A buffer length validation vulnerability in Asylo versions prior to 0.6.0 allows an attacker to read data they should not have access to. The 'enc_untrusted_recvfrom' function generates a return value which is deserialized by 'MessageReader', and copied into three different 'extents'. The length of the third 'extents' is controlled by the outside world, and not verified on copy, allowing the attacker to force Asylo to copy trusted memory data into an untrusted buffer of significantly small length.. We recommend updating Asylo to version 0.6.0 or later. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8902 | 1 Google | 1 Rendertron | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 3.5 LOW |
| Rendertron versions prior to 3.0.0 are are susceptible to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack. An attacker can use a specially crafted webpage to force a rendertron headless chrome process to render internal sites it has access to, and display it as a screenshot. Suggested mitigations are to upgrade your rendertron to version 3.0.0, or, if you cannot update, to secure the infrastructure to limit the headless chrome's access to your internal domain. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8852 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.7.0.29455. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of JPEG2000 files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9416. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8590 | 1 Netapp | 1 Clustered Data Ontap | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.1P18 and 9.3P12 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an attacker to discover node names via AutoSupport bundles even when the –remove-private-data parameter is set to true. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8589 | 1 Netapp | 1 Clustered Data Ontap | 2024-11-21 | 2.7 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
| Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5P15 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow unauthorized tenant users to discover the names of other Storage Virtual Machines (SVMs) and filenames on those SVMs. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8588 | 1 Netapp | 1 Clustered Data Ontap | 2024-11-21 | 2.7 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
| Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5P15 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow unauthorized tenant users to discover the existence of data on other Storage Virtual Machines (SVMs). | |||||
| CVE-2020-8578 | 1 Netapp | 1 Clustered Data Ontap | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an attacker to discover node names via AutoSupport bundles even when the –remove-private-data parameter is set to true. | |||||