Total
83414 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-4950 | 2 Apple, Vmware | 3 Mac Os X, Fusion, Workstation | 2024-11-21 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| VMware Workstation and Fusion contain an integer overflow vulnerability in VMware NAT service when IPv6 mode is enabled. This issue may lead to an out-of-bound read which can then be used to execute code on the host in conjunction with other issues. Note: IPv6 mode for VMNAT is not enabled by default. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4949 | 2 Apple, Vmware | 3 Mac Os X, Fusion, Workstation | 2024-11-21 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| VMware Workstation and Fusion contain a use-after-free vulnerability in VMware NAT service when IPv6 mode is enabled. This issue may allow a guest to execute code on the host. Note: IPv6 mode for VMNAT is not enabled by default. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4948 | 1 Vmware | 2 Horizon View, Workstation | 2024-11-21 | 6.6 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| VMware Workstation (14.x before 14.1.0 and 12.x) and Horizon View Client (4.x before 4.7.0) contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in TPView.dll. On Workstation, this issue in conjunction with other bugs may allow a guest to leak information from host or may allow for a Denial of Service on the Windows OS that runs Workstation. In the case of a Horizon View Client, this issue in conjunction with other bugs may allow a View desktop to leak information from host or may allow for a Denial of Service on the Windows OS that runs the Horizon View Client. Exploitation is only possible if virtual printing has been enabled. This feature is not enabled by default on Workstation but it is enabled by default on Horizon View. | |||||
| CVE-2017-4946 | 1 Vmware | 2 Vrealize Operations For Horizon, Vrealize Operations For Published Applications | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| The VMware V4H and V4PA desktop agents (6.x before 6.5.1) contain a privilege escalation vulnerability. Successful exploitation of this issue could result in a low privileged windows user escalating their privileges to SYSTEM. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3972 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 8.3 HIGH |
| Infrastructure-based foot printing vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via the server banner leaking potentially sensitive or security relevant information. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3971 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| Cryptanalysis vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows attackers to view confidential information via insecure use of RC4 encryption cyphers. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3969 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| Abuse of communication channels vulnerability in the server in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to decrypt messages via an inadequate implementation of SSL. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3968 | 1 Mcafee | 2 Network Data Loss Prevention, Network Security Manager | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Session fixation vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Manager (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 and McAfee Network Data Loss Prevention (NDLP) before 9.3.4.1.5 allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information or manipulate the database via a crafted authentication cookie. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3965 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (aka Session Riding) vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized tasks such as retrieving internal system information or manipulating the database via specially crafted URLs. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3776 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Lenovo Help | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Lenovo Help Android mobile app versions earlier than 6.1.2.0327 allowed information to be transmitted over an HTTP channel, permitting others observing the channel to potentially see this information. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3768 | 2 Ibm, Lenova | 84 Bladecenter Hs22, Bladecenter Hs22 Firmware, Bladecenter Hs23 and 81 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| An unprivileged attacker with connectivity to the IMM2 could cause a denial of service attack on the IMM2 (Versions earlier than 4.4 for Lenovo System x and earlier than 6.4 for IBM System x). Flooding the IMM2 with a high volume of authentication failures via the Common Information Model (CIM) used by LXCA and OneCLI and other tools can exhaust available system memory which can cause the IMM2 to reboot itself until the requests cease. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3765 | 2 Ibm, Lenovo | 30 1g L2-7 Slb Switch For Bladecenter, Bladecenter 1\, Bladecenter Layer 2\/3 Copper Ethernet Switch Module and 27 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.2 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| In Enterprise Networking Operating System (ENOS) in Lenovo and IBM RackSwitch and BladeCenter products, an authentication bypass known as "HP Backdoor" was discovered during a Lenovo security audit in the serial console, Telnet, SSH, and Web interfaces. This bypass mechanism can be accessed when performing local authentication under specific circumstances. If exploited, admin-level access to the switch is granted. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3762 | 2 Lenovo, Microsoft | 4 Fingerprint Manager Pro, Windows 7, Windows 8 and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sensitive data stored by Lenovo Fingerprint Manager Pro, version 8.01.86 and earlier, including users' Windows logon credentials and fingerprint data, is encrypted using a weak algorithm, contains a hard-coded password, and is accessible to all users with local non-administrative access to the system in which it is installed. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3224 | 3 Quagga, Redhat, Suse | 4 Quagga, Package Manager, Opensuse and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) protocol implementations may improperly determine Link State Advertisement (LSA) recency for LSAs with MaxSequenceNumber. According to RFC 2328 section 13.1, for two instances of the same LSA, recency is determined by first comparing sequence numbers, then checksums, and finally MaxAge. In a case where the sequence numbers are the same, the LSA with the larger checksum is considered more recent, and will not be flushed from the Link State Database (LSDB). Since the RFC does not explicitly state that the values of links carried by a LSA must be the same when prematurely aging a self-originating LSA with MaxSequenceNumber, it is possible in vulnerable OSPF implementations for an attacker to craft a LSA with MaxSequenceNumber and invalid links that will result in a larger checksum and thus a 'newer' LSA that will not be flushed from the LSDB. Propagation of the crafted LSA can result in the erasure or alteration of the routing tables of routers within the routing domain, creating a denial of service condition or the re-routing of traffic on the network. CVE-2017-3224 has been reserved for Quagga and downstream implementations (SUSE, openSUSE, and Red Hat packages). | |||||
| CVE-2017-3217 | 1 Calamp | 6 Lmu 3030 Cdma, Lmu 3030 Cdma Firmware, Lmu 3030 Gsm and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| CalAmp LMU 3030 series OBD-II CDMA and GSM devices has an SMS (text message) interface that can be deployed where no password is configured for this interface by the integrator / reseller. This interface must be password protected, otherwise, the attacker only needs to know the phone number of the device (via an IMSI Catcher, for example) to send administrative commands to the device. These commands can be used to provide ongoing, real-time access to the device and can configure parameters such as IP addresses, firewall rules, and passwords. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3210 | 4 Fujitsu, Hp, Philips and 1 more | 6 Displayview Click, Displayview Click Suite, Display Assistant and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Applications developed using the Portrait Display SDK, versions 2.30 through 2.34, default to insecure configurations which allow arbitrary code execution. A number of applications developed using the Portrait Displays SDK do not use secure permissions when running. These applications run the component pdiservice.exe with NT AUTHORITY/SYSTEM permissions. This component is also read/writable by all Authenticated Users. This allows local authenticated attackers to run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. The following applications have been identified by Portrait Displays as affected: Fujitsu DisplayView Click: Version 6.0 and 6.01. The issue was fixed in Version 6.3. Fujitsu DisplayView Click Suite: Version 5. The issue is addressed by patch in Version 5.9. HP Display Assistant: Version 2.1. The issue was fixed in Version 2.11. HP My Display: Version 2.0. The issue was fixed in Version 2.1. Philips Smart Control Premium: Versions 2.23, 2.25. The issue was fixed in Version 2.26. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3209 | 2 Busybox, Dbpower | 3 Busybox, U818a, U818a Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 4.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The DBPOWER U818A WIFI quadcopter drone provides FTP access over its own local access point, and allows full file permissions to the anonymous user. The DBPower U818A WIFI quadcopter drone runs an FTP server that by default allows anonymous access without a password, and provides full filesystem read/write permissions to the anonymous user. A remote user within range of the open access point on the drone may utilize the anonymous user of the FTP server to read arbitrary files, such as images and video recorded by the device, or to replace system files such as /etc/shadow to gain further access to the device. Furthermore, the DBPOWER U818A WIFI quadcopter drone uses BusyBox 1.20.2, which was released in 2012, and may be vulnerable to other known BusyBox vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3203 | 1 Pivotal | 1 Spring-flex | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The Java implementations of AMF3 deserializers in Pivotal/Spring Spring-flex derive class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification's recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3201 | 1 Exadel | 1 Flamingo Amf-serializer | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The Java implementation of AMF3 deserializers used in Flamingo amf-serializer by Exadel, version 2.2.0 derives class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification's recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3200 | 1 Graniteds | 1 Graniteds | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The Java implementation of AMF3 deserializers used in GraniteDS, version 3.1.1.G, may allow instantiation of arbitrary classes via their public parameter-less constructor and subsequently call arbitrary Java Beans setter methods. The ability to exploit this vulnerability depends on the availability of classes in the class path that make use of deserialization. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control information may be able to send serialized Java objects with pre-set properties that result in arbitrary code execution when deserialized. | |||||