CVE-2024-28250

{"id": "CVE-2024-28250", "cveTags": [], "metrics": {"cvssMetricV31": [{"type": "Secondary", "source": "security-advisories@github.com", "cvssData": {"scope": "CHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 6.1, "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH"}, "impactScore": 4.0, "exploitabilityScore": 1.6}, {"type": "Primary", "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "cvssData": {"scope": "CHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 6.1, "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH"}, "impactScore": 4.0, "exploitabilityScore": 1.6}]}, "published": "2024-03-18T22:15:08.750", "references": [{"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13", "tags": ["Release Notes"], "source": "security-advisories@github.com"}, {"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8", "tags": ["Release Notes"], "source": "security-advisories@github.com"}, {"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2", "tags": ["Release Notes"], "source": "security-advisories@github.com"}, {"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6", "tags": ["Vendor Advisory"], "source": "security-advisories@github.com"}, {"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13", "tags": ["Release Notes"], "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"}, {"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8", "tags": ["Release Notes"], "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"}, {"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2", "tags": ["Release Notes"], "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"}, {"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6", "tags": ["Vendor Advisory"], "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"}], "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [{"type": "Secondary", "source": "security-advisories@github.com", "description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-311"}]}, {"type": "Primary", "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-319"}]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue."}, {"lang": "es", "value": "Cilium es una soluci\u00f3n de redes, observabilidad y seguridad con un plano de datos basado en eBPF. A partir de la versi\u00f3n 1.14.0 y anteriores a las versiones 1.14.8 y 1.15.2, en los cl\u00fasteres de Cilium con WireGuard habilitado y el tr\u00e1fico que coincide con las pol\u00edticas de Capa 7, el tr\u00e1fico elegible para Wireguard que se env\u00eda entre el proxy Envoy de un nodo y los pods de otros nodos se env\u00eda sin cifrar. y el tr\u00e1fico elegible para Wireguard que se env\u00eda entre el proxy DNS de un nodo y los pods de otros nodos se env\u00eda sin cifrar. Este problema se resolvi\u00f3 en Cilium 1.14.8 y 1.15.2 en modo de enrutamiento nativo (`routingMode=native`) y en Cilium 1.14.4 en modo de t\u00fanel (`routingMode=tunnel`). No es que en modo t\u00fanel, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` deba establecerse en `true`. No se conoce ning\u00fan workaround para este problema."}], "lastModified": "2025-01-09T16:47:40.047", "configurations": [{"nodes": [{"negate": false, "cpeMatch": [{"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "50C01BB2-3804-450F-846D-DE7A23112DF6", "versionEndExcluding": "1.14.8", "versionStartIncluding": "1.14.0"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "9938037D-85A4-4964-B593-33015AEFC8DB", "versionEndExcluding": "1.15.2", "versionStartIncluding": "1.15.0"}], "operator": "OR"}]}], "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com"}