** DISPUTED ** The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance "does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key."
References
Configurations
History
27 Jan 2025, 21:15
Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
---|---|---|
CVSS |
v2 : v3 : |
v2 : 5.8
v3 : 7.4 |
21 Nov 2024, 01:40
Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
---|---|---|
References | () http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html - | |
References | () http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/ - | |
References | () http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/ - | |
References | () https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372 - | |
References | () https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt - |
Information
Published : 2012-07-09 10:20
Updated : 2025-04-11 00:51
NVD link : CVE-2012-3372
Mitre link : CVE-2012-3372
CVE.ORG link : CVE-2012-3372
JSON object : View
Products Affected
elitecore
- cyberoam_unified_threat_management
CWE
CWE-310
Cryptographic Issues